- Jan 16, 2002
- 2,252
- 102
- 63
well if he waits long enough the whole problem might become irrelevant.Wolfman Von Jones said:Do you know some scientist actually sent a sub-atomic partical into the future via lasers and he's waiting for his future self to send it back to him?
then his future self (selves?) is a prick and didn't deserve to receive that beautiful particle in the first place, the ungrateful bastard, the freeloader!MagSec4 said:Or, what if he does receive something while waiting, but then deliberately refuses to send it in the future?
But it is possible to move slower through time than everyone else. But it makes sense that you cannot actually go backwords.Dark_Jester said:According to scientific theory, things can be sent forwards, but not back, we cannot revisit what has already occurred. So anything that goes forward stays forward.