Official Question-Answer Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
A: I love the vocal part in music, but my voice dies in pretending, I'm afraid. I'm a frustrated singer. :erk:

Q: Do you like this new forum appearance? <--- The real question is: don't you feel somehow annoying to find out your question is a bad copycat of someone else's question? :ill:


|ng (Wandering around)
 
i'm pretty good, thank you :) it's Finland's birthday today :cool: my neck and back hurt like hell, cause me and Ormir were at a metalbar last night, and got a bit carried away headbanging

how're you?
 
A: I like snow. But too much of it = snow blind.

Q: What is your view on capital punishment/death penalty?
 
I dont know. Its one of those "you'll just have to wait and see," type of situations.

Do you know some scientist actually sent a sub-atomic partical into the future via lasers and he's waiting for his future self to send it back to him?
 
Thats true, except, his theory is that all time is is abunch of differant moments existing all at once. So if that were the case, his future self could infact send him back a particle.
 
If he's waiting still, then his future self will never send it.
What if he chooses to send it anyways ..once some time has gone?
That means his theory is wrong because he never did get what he just sent.

Or, what if he does receive something while waiting, but then deliberately refuses to send it in the future?
 
MagSec4 said:
Or, what if he does receive something while waiting, but then deliberately refuses to send it in the future?
then his future self (selves?) is a prick and didn't deserve to receive that beautiful particle in the first place, the ungrateful bastard, the freeloader!
 
Does that mean that his future self will never receive whatever he sent, because it will just swoosh past his head and continue travelling onwards, further into the future?
 
Dark_Jester said:
According to scientific theory, things can be sent forwards, but not back, we cannot revisit what has already occurred. So anything that goes forward stays forward.
But it is possible to move slower through time than everyone else. But it makes sense that you cannot actually go backwords.
 
Well time travel doesnt move forward or backwards, it moves on a diagonal. Considering what Ben said, you can travel back. Only, if you did something, like kill Hitler to stop WW2 in Europe, it wouldnt matter b/c it has all already taken place.

Nick
 
Status
Not open for further replies.