After listening to Ghost Reveries now for years, and with the new album coming up, I was wondering something, and I wanted to know if anyone feels the same or if it's just me.
The main difference of GR compared to their other albums is, I think, the fact that the songs differ a lot more in style. So much even that they maybe should have been part of another project than Opeth ...
First of all: I love all Opeth songs so far, also Atonement and certainly Hours of Wealth (gives me goosebumps). But these 2 songs at least don't really fit in the album. This is the reason that I didn't like Atonement for a long time, because it simply doesn't fit in ... if it would be part of a different album with songs with the same vibe, than I would have liked it a lot more. I've listened to it on it's own, and I started to like it more then.
Perhaps I can compare it to Devin Townsend to make clear what I want to say. Imagine that he put a song from the DTB or other projects on a Strapping Young Lad album? It wouldn't work ...
Or imagine a song from Damnation being on another album of Opeth, it wouldn't work either ...
Opeth had a lot of variety before on their albums, but always consistent with the vibe of the album. I couldn't imagine Deliverance without A Fair Judgement for example.
There are several other possibilities ... Mikael could do side projects (of course I know how time consuming these things can be), or they could with the same bandmembers from Opeth release other stuff under a different band name, or they could release different albums (like they did with Damnation), or they could make EP's for these kinds of stuff ...
Well, in short, I'm not downgrading Opeth at all, I love all of their music thusfar. But it seems that Mikael had "too many" ideas when writing for GR and they put them all on one album which didn't really work for some songs. He has a lot of ideas now again, I'm wondering if it will be that ecclectic again or that there will be more consistency again. I don't really like albums that are a collection of very different songs ... an album is a whole and should be conceived that way.
Does anyone agree?
(sorry for the long explanation, but hey, perhaps this will keep away the stupid kids with their superficial and hollow one-sentence remarks)
The main difference of GR compared to their other albums is, I think, the fact that the songs differ a lot more in style. So much even that they maybe should have been part of another project than Opeth ...
First of all: I love all Opeth songs so far, also Atonement and certainly Hours of Wealth (gives me goosebumps). But these 2 songs at least don't really fit in the album. This is the reason that I didn't like Atonement for a long time, because it simply doesn't fit in ... if it would be part of a different album with songs with the same vibe, than I would have liked it a lot more. I've listened to it on it's own, and I started to like it more then.
Perhaps I can compare it to Devin Townsend to make clear what I want to say. Imagine that he put a song from the DTB or other projects on a Strapping Young Lad album? It wouldn't work ...
Or imagine a song from Damnation being on another album of Opeth, it wouldn't work either ...
Opeth had a lot of variety before on their albums, but always consistent with the vibe of the album. I couldn't imagine Deliverance without A Fair Judgement for example.
There are several other possibilities ... Mikael could do side projects (of course I know how time consuming these things can be), or they could with the same bandmembers from Opeth release other stuff under a different band name, or they could release different albums (like they did with Damnation), or they could make EP's for these kinds of stuff ...
Well, in short, I'm not downgrading Opeth at all, I love all of their music thusfar. But it seems that Mikael had "too many" ideas when writing for GR and they put them all on one album which didn't really work for some songs. He has a lot of ideas now again, I'm wondering if it will be that ecclectic again or that there will be more consistency again. I don't really like albums that are a collection of very different songs ... an album is a whole and should be conceived that way.
Does anyone agree?
(sorry for the long explanation, but hey, perhaps this will keep away the stupid kids with their superficial and hollow one-sentence remarks)