atoragon
Member
cmon guys don't fight
anyway I have said the jb is pretty sharp because usually the lesser the output, the minor the low end, this is a general rule, and because of my experience with the 6 strings version (instead on the opposite side of the spectrum I consider, after having tried it, the invader muddy because of the output: is so high that the lows are untamable, therefore to me it sounds muddy).
The d-activator instead lasted very little on my guitar, there was something odd going on in the midrange, like you had to tweak a lot with the eq to make it sound properly.
My favourite one is the 85 just because of its eq curve: when I record it, I almost don't have to eq it during mixing, and this for me is the most important thing: the right tone is all already there (but is active, so it's not what you're looking for).
Probably the nazgul at this point could be a good choice, if you don't want to pay for a bareknuckle (which costs twice as much).
anyway I have said the jb is pretty sharp because usually the lesser the output, the minor the low end, this is a general rule, and because of my experience with the 6 strings version (instead on the opposite side of the spectrum I consider, after having tried it, the invader muddy because of the output: is so high that the lows are untamable, therefore to me it sounds muddy).
The d-activator instead lasted very little on my guitar, there was something odd going on in the midrange, like you had to tweak a lot with the eq to make it sound properly.
My favourite one is the 85 just because of its eq curve: when I record it, I almost don't have to eq it during mixing, and this for me is the most important thing: the right tone is all already there (but is active, so it's not what you're looking for).
Probably the nazgul at this point could be a good choice, if you don't want to pay for a bareknuckle (which costs twice as much).