Matt
Active Member
Well, you are wrong. And your opinion is only a pawn in the midst of my words.
That doesn't even make sense
And also, there is no such thing as a wrong or right opinion.
.
Incorrect.
Well, you are wrong. And your opinion is only a pawn in the midst of my words.
And also, there is no such thing as a wrong or right opinion.
.
The stuff Syd wrote was highly influenced by the Beatles actually, it wasn't until DSOTM that they actually redefined their sound imo... I don't understand what you mean though, when you say he was an "Experimental person". He did a lot of drugs?
Basically everyone has said it already. Their influence is undeniable, but their music was nothing special. It was very immature, even their revolutionary/protest music. John Lennon was no prophet or musical genius. His popularity got in the way of other songwriters who were truly monumental and revolutionary:
Roger Waters
Peter Gabriel
Ian Anderson
These guys were more advanced and intellectual than Lennon on several levels (in my opinion...)
And also, there is no such thing as a wrong or right opinion.
I'd say The White Album would be a good place to start. It's got a great range of stuff on it, and it's a double album. The thing about the band is that they had their poppy, kids friendly stuff like Yellow Submarine and Ob La Di, Ob La Da which were largely written by either Ringo Starr or Paul McCartney. I think a lot of people write the band off because of this lighter, fluffier material coupled with the fact that they were so hugely popular. I find some of that material ok and that's what drew me to the band as a child, but it's the other stuff I love the most.
Abbey Road and Revolver are fantastic albums as well.
Mathiäs;6970236 said:That doesn't even make sense
Correct.
Those aren't really opinions.
Opinion: A belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
'It is my opinion that Earth revolves around the sun.' <-- right
'It is my opinion that the sun revolves around Earth.' <-- wrong
I've been listening to the The White Album lately and it seems nice enough. It doesn't seem without flaws though. One thing that strikes me is how incoherent the album is. It almost feels like you're listening to a compilation than an actual studio album with tracks like Ob-la-di Ob-la-da, Helter Skelter, Revolution 9 and Good Night all on the same album. I also think it has a good amount of filler on it. I'm pretty sure they could have cut this down to not be a double album and it would have been better for it.
It's too bad the radio tends to warp your view of a band like the Beatles by mostly focusing on their most tedious songs.
Seems to me it used to be somewhat common for bands to record a wide variety of material on one record. I dont think anyone thought much of it at that time. Now its nearly the complete opposite where an entire recording could be viewed as one song with ten variations.
Ok, whatever, you either get what I was talking about or you dont
I surely didnt mean to imply that many bands did goofy stuff like ob la de or Rocky Raccoon to qualify for what I was talking about.