- Jan 6, 2006
- 91
- 0
- 6
This is what i was getting. Bands that are hailed as technical, but clearly aren't.Mercy/Severity said:I have input. A metal magazine claimed Trivium to be a technical band. What the fuck.
I enjoy Nile a lot, and also Suffocation who have been deemed to be a tech death band
I expected to be dissagreed with but i must say that i am rather disappointed. The guitar wanker kings, being Petrucci, Vai, etc. are terrible because they heartlessly jack off their guitar necks in chromatic scales 13-14-15-16 all up and down the neck. It is passionless nonsense that gets hailed as technical but is simple and as i see it fucking stupid. Nile and Between the Buried and Me are successful technical because they are not capable of playing fast and heavy, but slowing things down every once and while, and incorporate good solid solos while staying in key. That's real talent, that's real technicality.
instead of just discrediting my opinion because I said that a band you like isn't what I consider good technicality, think about what i'm trying to say. So many of you are just calling me stupid instead of actually trying to express a real opinion. Maybe list some bands that you think are good technical instead of trying to insult me.
For example, I like Meshuggah, iu just thinnk that they are radically overrated, specifically their new stuff. Every song is a collection of a whole two notes that are praised as technical just because thjey hit arbitrary eitghth notes. THAT'S NOT TECHNICAL! THAT'S BORING!
Instead of calling me names use your brain and try to express an actual opinion. If you don't think Nile, Golem, or Between the Buried and Me aren't good then tell me who are instead of just bitching. I'm not saying that they're the only technical metal bands, they are just the best examples i can think of.
Guitar wank is stupid.