Epistopheles
Pessimist
- Mar 25, 2014
- 17
- 0
- 1
It's no easy read, that's for sure.
I finished Danielewski's The Fifty Year Sword a few months ago. Not as good as House of Leaves by far, but still interesting. It's so hopelessly dense that I don't believe any kind of "accurate" reading is possible. The text is laid out like a poem on each page, and colors designate speakers but it's nearly impossible to keep track of who's actually talking. The story is also almost entirely metaphoric, although it isn't an allegory. There's something sinister beneath the whole thing, but I can't quite say what it is.
Worth a read, but be prepared to be, ultimately, confused.
^ he should try writing a normal book one day and see what happens.
That sounds absolutely awful. Colors? Why the fuck?
A text is many things. Why should we exclude color from the assemblage?
at least Fifty Year Sword is more readable than Only Revolutions. Fuck that shit.
Just finished reading Stoner by John Williams, which I recommended to Ein and Zeph. Interesting novel. One of the most interesting ideas covered in the story is the idea of the university as a sanctuary that must be protected and kept clean of...posers I suppose would be the best word. Charlatans posing as educators? At any rate, good stuff.
Because the words on the page are more important?
I just find the idea of putting the text in colors to signal who is speaking pointless and exists solely to confuse the reader and be "different."
But you know me and how I feel about that king of stuff already![]()
currently reading V by Thomas Pynchon. One chapter in and I'm not hooked yet. Hmph