lord667
=UM=Heartburn
What do you think of people who's taste in music hardly ever changes? They listen to the same bands for years, never branching out within or outside their favorite genres.
I think they're damn lucky to have found satisfaction so quickly. If they're happy with what they've got, fine. There's no reason why someone should have to branch out into new bands or genres if they think they've got all the music they need.
Many seem to hate music listeners that have shallow reasons for their tastes. What about those that have deep reasons but a love for a genre/band you hate?
The foundations for a person's taste in music don't mean enough for me to hate them because of it. What matters more (though still not all that much) is whether I think the person is being pretentious, slagging off music that they secretly enjoy (or praising music that they're only pretending to like) in order to look sophisticated. You just know that some anus.com folk have Spice Girls albums hidden in their darkest recesses.
Since I've no special hatred for shallow audiences, correspondingly, I've no special love for thoughtful ones. It's music. Jive and dance to it or sit and frown to it, it's your own choice and there's room in the world for both. If your soundtrack of choice is something I don't like, then as long as you don't force me to listen to it, I don't care.
Is there a pinnacle in this evolution?
No, I don't think so. The only thing that might represent a pinnacle is becoming hyper-open-minded and liking everything, or evolving so far that no music yet created is enjoyable anymore, and thus liking nothing. Evolving beyond either of those points would probably be impossible.