unhinged said:I think what you were trying to convey in the thread
is that in the 80's metal was metal with metallica, slayer, maiden etc and these days what is perceived as metal isn't. ie linkin park and such shite
the thing is in the 80's, certainly early-mid, the likes of europe, bon jovi and poison were just as much percieved by the average person as metal. so we had the same shit back then.
this applies to more than metal by the way
with the advances in media what has become more exiting in the late 90's + 00's is the general ease of availability of good music if you look for it and the connectivity of a wider more worldwide underground....like I can connect with you now from the other side of the world and say go and check out 'so + so'
(for the record I was big on tape trading)
just this week I've learned about and heard 2 great bands I wouldn't have ever heard about
of course this ease has its downside with any twat with a modem and a guitar being able to swamp the scene with shit
and there are 1000's more sterile imitations of the latest fad to wade through
there are plus and minus but in reality youve got it better now
Well spoken dear friend, I wasn't around in the 80s so I really have no idea, and I was going to say that Maiden, Megadeth and Metallica was what stuck anyway but then I realized I'm 8798245 times more likely to hear 'The Final Countdown' somewhere more or less public than even 'One'
I don't know what I was aiming for with this thread really but I've changed my mind at least 3-4 times since I started it I think because I just typed without involving my brain, just like I am now. Anyways, to sum it up: It wasn't much better back then, just different. And it wasn't worse. Agree?