jesus christ I swear the average iq of people on this board is probably somewhere around 80 because you are some daft motherfuckers.
my opinion is just as valid as your opinion is.
I havent been banned because deron nor samsara haven't seen fit to ban me for supposedly "trolling". my opinion is just as valid as your opinion is.
and why do we have to stick to only metal? this isn't "the most diverse metal album you ever heard," it's "the most diverse album." there's a huge difference, and anybody naming a metal album in this thread...their opinion is basically invalid. watershed is not a "diverse" record, considering it follows the same opeth formula (give-or-take) as the rest of the albums. mixing metal with acoustic guitars is not diverse, guys.
That's what I said... only talking about acting like a douche with everyone.
I agree acoustic + metal =/= diverse, I was just kinda thinking at the time that watershed is a little more complicated than that. The acoustic sections in previous Opeth albums are very samey, with the same guitar tones, chords, whatever (though awesome..) but the styles in Burden's cleanness (70s rock-ballad kinda thing, whatever you call per's solo) are not similar to The Lotus Eater's cleanness (somewhat bluesy followed by funk). In that way, I think Watershed is much more diverse than any Opeth album, although clean tracks in Ghost Reveries are significantly different from one another as well. I'd definitely say calling that just average transitions from acoustic to metal is simplifying it an aweful lot as if just to be critical of metal for no good reason.
you didn't dispute my second point, about the title of this thread. I'm disappointed.