STINNETT
Bad / Nationwide
I agree that starting an atheist organization under "religious" status simply for tax exemption status is not the way to go, and could be prone to tax fraud and IRS investigations. That was just the first thing that came to my mind where religion gets special treatment from the government, and therefore has an advantage of power over the non-religious. I just think we should have an equal opportunity that every religion seems to have.
I agree that atheism is a complete absence in superstitious belief. Only by a small technicality in definition do I think atheism could fall under the religious category, not that I agree it should belong there! Until now, the best category I could place atheism in was a belief, but perhaps now after reading your comments a better category would simply be that atheism is an opinion.
I understand those frustrations, and from that perspective I could say I agree.
My personal opinion is that the word "atheist" is largely meaningless and pointless beyond the social stigma that it carries, and by that I mean that most people don't draw any other conclusions from the term but those. It's a label that theists require us to carry, and it perpetuates that devisiveness that James summed up so well.
I am an atheist, because I don't believe in any sort of God, but I generally choose not to define myself as such. I am "not-religious", or even "irreligious" when the question comes up.