Slammed
Active Member
- Jun 15, 2017
- 31,334
- 45,038
- 113
So the second guy knew he had nothing lol.
Umm, between Masterpiece and XI? Holy shit. Hold on while I laugh my ass off. Masterpiece is a complete piece of crap and that is pretty much universally know. I bought that when it came out and I think I took it right back to the store saying it had a defect. Luckily I didn't have to get another copy of it because it was so bad they didn't have any others. to call it Masterpiece really shows how long Vanderhoof has been out of touch. Or an ego maniac. And after (in between XI) are the Ronnie Monroe albums, which to me put them in amateur hour. Different line ups, bad songs. XI, I liked much more than the new one. Part of it is obviously because Howe had just come back. I still thought it needed a heavier sound and better drums. But overall it had good songs. I figured they just needed an album to get their stride. The new one has better drums but that's it. The solos are worse, there's no cool bass. And some definite cheese to the lyrics and some of the vocals. At least while not as heavy or fast as I wanted XI had some good and catchy songs, and a bit of darkness the new one is just doesn't. It sounds like rushed out secondhand leftovers. There's like two tracks I would recommend, other than two out of the three they released before the album came out. IF I had to recommend anything.
And the fact that Kurd has said the production of every other metal album is very funny. I wonder why this guy doesn't find that offensive?! What does he think of Kurdt saying all black metal is shit? Is that not disrespectful of musicians?! Testament, Megadeth, Slayer, Overkill and Flotsam And Jetsam's albums from the same time all sound full and pounding. MC DOES sound like Presto Ballet. Weak shit. And a very big disappointment from a band who has three albums that too me are as good as anything anyone has done. But as I've said before and I'm sure some may be sick of hearing. This isn't that band. These guys as musicians don't compare to that line up.
As much I don't care for Risk. At least the production was good.
The second guy claiming the album to be a 5/5 then rating a 4.5/5 higher in the end of year ranking proves he had nothing, further proof was his review claimed Monkey Finger to be the best track on the record
But it really does sound like these guys don't know that Metal Church were a band back in the 80's. That's part of the reason I kept saying that this album IS NOT Metal Church. Even if people want to claim it as a good record it's not the band that made those great albums, it's not the record Kurdt and Howe claimed it was going to be and it's not metal.
I accept that my pop reference was probably a shit stir as much as anything but at the same time I thought the obviousness of the exaggeration helped point out that there is a huge difference between real metal and this album. Like it, love it, appreciate it, who cares but to call it metal is really stretching the genre of metal.