Kazrog
Kazrog, Inc.
@MrBongo: the Visual Studio C++ redistributables (or Microsoft runtimes or how you would call them) are _not_ all inclusive. So installing 2013 does not automatically install 2012 or 2010 . (DotNet kinda the same, installing 1.0 is not the same as 2.0.. from from 2.0 to 3.5 to 4.5 they _arE_ inclusive. Really confusing stuff, and mostly this is why they are included in the installers for software, cause it's too much work and understanding for regular users to know this stuff. I guess Kazrog had his mind on different things this weekend ).
4.0.0 from Recabinet needs the 2012 one (there seems to be only one installer for x86 or x64 for this, so just the microsoft link for 'visual c++ redistributable 2012 update 4'. Installing the separate DLL's may work, but it's really not recommended
I'm going to be brutally honest here. I was unaware that Microsoft allows developers to include these libraries with their installers, and I used to think these libraries were included with Windows by default, and that only users running hacked minimal Windows builds would have these kinds of issues. I'll make sure that's handled by the installer from now on.
But really, why doesn't Microsoft include their own SDK's DLLs with their OS? They fill your drive with tons of useless bloatware (MS Paint, Comic Sans, etc.), but leave out key DLLs that would be used by a huge percentage of applications for their platform.
</rant>