skyrefuge
Member
Where exactly are these markets that people can't "afford" the rent on a 2 bedroom apartment? The Empire State Building? The John Hancock Tower? I'm convinced more and more every day that the media simply makes shit up to fill the pages.
I don't know, it doesn't seem like they're making anything up, they laid out the figures pretty clearly. The 2-bedroom apartment line referred only to food service (think McDonald's) and retail (think Gap salesgirl) professions. And it didn't say that they couldn't afford any 2br apartment; they just couldn't afford the median. By definition, 50% of the apartments in those areas are cheaper than that, so I'm sure they can find some place they can afford.
to pay $600K in interest on a $500K property over 30 years is assinine to me.
Only if the cost of rent over the rest of your life (50 years?) is significantly cheaper than $1.1M. And generally, in this country, it hasn't been, which is one reason why people who can afford to, buy instead of rent. Things are a bit screwy at the moment, so it's probably still not the best time to buy, but things will surely change (many times!) over the next 30-50 years. (oh, and you'd have to be getting a fairly shit rate to pay $600K in interest, but yeah, certainly the interest is an enormous part of the total cost)
Neil