I totally see where this is coming from and can agree with some of the points made. I don't have a problem with people not liking Iconoclast.
I get annoyed when people act like they're better than the people who like Iconoclast (an imaginary group that doesn't even exist as an entity separate of SX fans generally) because the like the old stuff better. I get annoyed when people jump on the hipsterish bandwagon of automatically hating on the new stuff because liking older, supposedly less-known material is cool (obviously a phenomenon outside fans of SX as well). I get annoyed when people act like they somehow know that Romeo is either selling out or has been enslaved by Allen's preference for more straightforward material because they can't possibly accept that their hero is most likely writing exactly what he wants to write.
Preferrences aside, letting things not related to the actual music infuence your attitude towards said music is retarded. And I'll be damned if this isn't something that happens even on this very forum to some extent.
Your hypothesis doesn't seem to account for the fact that the same people who supposedly dislike Iconoclast because it is newer and more well-known also do not generally favor the debut album, which is the oldest and least well-known of SX's albums, over Divine Wings, V, etc., which are newer and more famous.
So there goes that theory.
That's true for me, too, at least with Symphony X. I generally consider their 10+ minute songs to be their best, but not just because of their length; they're simply more intricate and interesting songs to me. I want to be taken on a musical journey (as cheesy as that sounds). Songs like "Bastards of the Machine" just don't cut it for me.
So very true.
To me, Divine Wings through (and including) The Odyssey is their high point. The debut would have been just as good (if not better) than Damnation Game if Russ had done the vocals, although the production on both albums is quite bad.
My dislike for Iconoclast and PL isn't because it's more "well-known." It's because the music just isn't as good. The magic (trying not to sound too cheesy) is gone; it's just mostly generic "tuf guy" metal now. Any metal band can write generic metal, but I prefer Symphony X to write the powerful, progressive stuff. I want a song to take me on a journey, not feature just "cool riffs, bro."
Your hypothesis doesn't seem to account for the fact that the same people who supposedly dislike Iconoclast because it is newer and more well-known also do not generally favor the debut album, which is the oldest and least well-known of SX's albums, over Divine Wings, V, etc., which are newer and more famous.
So there goes that theory.
That only addresses one third of my so called "theory", and doesn't even effectively debunk it. Of course people would rather be a part of a cool minority than be the only one that prefers something. It's not ultimately about how old or unknown the stuff is (although those are two big factors), but about how much prog-cred or whatever one perceives he can gain.
Surely anyone interested in seeing my actual point about this has done so already (and if you haven't, read the last two sentences of my last post again), so let's not start going over the minor details. I'd rather have this thread get back to V appreciation.
I don't think I was arguing over a detail - your main point was that people dislike Iconoclast because it's newer and more popular, and that claim is false.
Seems like everyone here discusses at length which albums they like based on musical qualities alone
What's lame is when we people get all worked up and start arguing over MUSIC.
Seems like everyone here discusses at length which albums they like based on musical qualities alone (with exception granted to that one time someone accused Russell Allen of trying to sound black).
Hahaha, please refresh my memory of said incident. I don't recall it but it sounds absolutely hilarious.
I forgot who it was, but someone said he was trying to pull a "gangsta" accent in Walls of Babylon when he says "RIIIDAAAZZ"
It turned into a really loud, dumb debate.
I searched V front and back but I couldn't find such a song!
From creative point of view "Iconoclast" looks great ,but cd booklet is not so good ...so many blood ...wrong way for SX
or the "too many blood. wrong way for symx". Best critique of IC to date.
I appreciate this album. More than you can possibly imagine.
For me to go into exactly how much I appreciate and admire this album would either make you all crack up, or it would bring the thread to a screeching halt.
Everybody is/was talking about the music, and while the music is awesome and the entire reason it's my favorite Symphony X album, what's peoples' opinions on the lyrics and the concept/subject of the album?
I would if it wasn't weird... Is that weird?....You don't bathe with it, do you?