Devy_Metal said:if they stopped playing solos id stop listening to them. bottom line.
Tempest said:thats pretty gay.
teredd said:Try this:
Go crank up protools or something and extract the solo parts
from your favorite NM song. Listen a few times and tell us
how it feels or your opinion of the arrangement...
Either way, cool beats and such but reminds me a "got milk" type of
commercial in the making.
Tempest said::Spin: yeah.. that made LOTS of sense...
oh wait, no it didn't
Jody42147 said:This thread is gay
Tempest said:then explain wtf "Listen a few times and tell us
how it feels or your opinion of the arrangement...
Either way, cool beats and such but reminds me a "got milk" type of
commercial in the making." means... it looks to me like you can hardly speak english.
And all I was saying originally was that if someone says "fuck this i dont want to listen to them anymore" simply because they dont solo anymore is fucking gay.
schenkadere said:In some cases, the guitar treatment...solos, harmonies, etc. is the difference between true metal and all the other lame ass off shoots such as nu metal or metalcore. Guitar as the up front instrument, soloing included, is critical. how many times have you listened to a song just waiting for the guitar solo, or how many times have you heard a good song and said, wait, where's the guitar solo? It's very important to this genre.
Tempest said:At the same time it's kinda overdone, does EVERYSONG really need to have a solo? I dont think so. And I dont think it's what seperates genres. If System of a Down played a solo in every song, would that make them "Metal"? I dont think so.
Tempest said:heres a good example.. would guitar solos make Metallica's ST Anger CD any better?
Tempest said:thats pretty gay.