I have to say, I really dont know any philosophers other than the few philosophy students on this forum. Are there any non-academic philosophers? By and large, I think the problem is all of academia (with exceptions of course), not merely philosophers, share the same rigid and pretentious outlook and personality.
Where can I get a brush that size?
Yeah...to be honest, I've never heard anyone who described himself as a scholar who wasn't more or less full of himself.
http://www.morehouse.edu/facstaff/nnobis/papers/ed.html
A philosopher should be like a dog with a bone. They grab hold of the problem and won't let go.
I am put off from arguing this way because I used to make my father really angry taking apart his argument, trying to show him what it is that he seems to be saying and why it seems flawed to me and so on. I am tempted do this in various forums that I frequent, but fear that it is taken as being offensive to the person I am debating with. I appreciate it if someone would debate with me in that way, just so long as they are not constantly playing "devil's advocate" as that really is annoying!
What do you all think?
I am not sure which, but at least one of the ancient philosophers really annoyed those he was debating with - probably Socrates did at least.
Out of curiosity, did everyone else have such active minds when they were that young, or am I just strange? It seems to me that most adults don't expect or even believe that kids can be deep like that.
...and full of shit.
Good, I'm glad it's not just me. I wouldn't say I had a large scale view, but I certainly thought in long term, such as "it doesn't matter because I'm going to die no matter what," but not so long term as to understand that our solar system will deteriorate and eventually the entire universe my no longer exist in its current form.No, I had many similar thoughts. I think my little kid philosophical thoughts were very sophist/nihlist. I was very good at looking at a large scale too. The stuff I learned in high school totally annoyed me. How hard is it to understand existentialism, really, can we move on now? I'm sure such things were thought way before people even began writing. But yeah, that's just my experience.
My ex-girlfriend is taking a Death & Dying course right now and asked me for help last week thinking of an epitaph, because it was one of her assignments. I came up withI've never taken the "it doesn't matter because we'll all die" view, but I've used that to avoid the "what will they put on my tombstone" outlook.
Good, I'm glad it's not just me. I wouldn't say I had a large scale view, but I certainly thought in long term, such as "it doesn't matter because I'm going to die no matter what," but not so long term as to understand that our solar system will deteriorate and eventually the entire universe my no longer exist in its current form.
We didn't have philosophy in my high school, but when I took an intro philosophy course in college, I was annoyed because in my opinion, everything that we discussed was intuitive enough that there was no reason to spend more than a few minutes discussing each concept.
crap. Sorry guys, I seem to have inadvertently sparked another bitch-about-school thread.
Thats okay. I dont know how it relates to this thread though. Public Schooling in America is absolute shit. I havent subsstituted in 5 years, but I remember how bad it was--how I essentially was a glorified gaurd for all but the one class of intelligent students each teacher seemed to get one bell a day.
Perhaps Feathers and Flames should write a new thread about his schooling experiences. It is an important philosophical subject (well, education was an important philosophical subject before philosophy was lost to the ivory towers.)
derek's right, "philosophy kids" are the worst... I know, I'm trapped in a department full of them .