2012 Presidential election thread

I guess that I interpreted "safe" as "a safe candidate for a Republican victory in 2012" where you guys mean safe as in "a safe candidate not to fuck things up as President". Strong political/ideological conviction in politics is not very common in general, so I don't see that as a strike against him relative to almost anyone else.
 
I've tossed around the idea of multiple creations/clearings (among other things). Seems more valid than the concept of radical, sustained, beneficial mutation.
 
1027681737_18qx_xlarge.jpeg
 
The Republican leadership would just say that the primaries don't reflect the "true" wishes of the Republican voters and then select the runner up in a convention, etc.

I would love for that to happen. Rip the fucking mask off the process for everyone to see.