No, man. It definitely is melodic. That can't be argued. I just don't think that many of the vocal melodies are creative, interesting or good. That's cool if you do.
The average Symphony X song length has always been ~5-6 minutes so nothing has changed in that regard. There's nothing wrong with songs like "Heretic". It's the lack of diversity within the album overall that's most disappointing. I don't really see how you can call it evolving and moving forward when so much of Iconoclast is extremely similar to both itself and Paradise Lost. There are only a few sections of music where something stands out as being unique. Yeah, they've become a little heavier too. Sure.
^ Hmmm... you're right. These heavy albums only generate temporary fans, not long-term fans like I've been, and originally expected to be. They lose their old fans, and they do not keep the new ones... interesting.
After all, they are a METAL band. Are they not? If there was songs that were stylistically all over the place, then the bitching would start about lack of cohesion songwise. To me the album flows perfectly with WAiL as a break in the action. I really believe some of you people take this stuff too seriously. Heavy metal music is supposed to be fun.I think that's the key right there. They've always had heavy songs, but it seems that they've left most of their progressive elements in the past. Almost every song on Iconoclast is indistinguishable from one another; it's just heavy hitter after heavy hitter. There's simply no variety, save for one song.
Oh, and Purveyor, many people don't think that Symphony X has evolved. I'd say they've devolved, if anything. You know, like that gun they used in that terrible Super Mario Bros movie. Now it seems that Symphony X just wants to make HEAVY HEAVY SMASH SMASH music.
As for the actual topic, I agree that the setlist is bad. Using a lot of songs from the latest album on a tour that supports it is generally a good thing, but this is taking it way too far. They've left no room for classics (except the two that they always seem to play) or, even more importantly, some unexpected curveballs.
After all, they are a METAL band. Are they not? If there was songs that were stylistically all over the place, then the bitching would start about lack of cohesion songwise. To me the album flows perfectly with WAiL as a break in the action. I really believe some of you people take this stuff too seriously. Heavy metal music is supposed to be fun.
I would literally get zero entertainment from seeing Sins and Inferno live. I would rather just leave and go home.
That some people label the band as 'metal', which is a wide genre that has no clear boundaries, is not an excuse for making uninspired shit...
You are utterly, utterly wrong. This post is based on nothing. Also, this forum is the only place I've run into such negativity towars Iconoclast and Paradise Lost, two albums that have generally gotten a great response from both metal fans and metal media.
I also second everything that Purveyor of Evil has written in this thread.
As for the actual topic, I agree that the setlist is bad. Using a lot of songs from the latest album on a tour that supports it is generally a good thing, but this is taking it way too far. They've left no room for classics (except the two that they always seem to play) or, even more importantly, some unexpected curveballs.
I'm pretty sure they don't play only for themselves so that's wrong.
How long have you been here, or even been a huge fan of the band?
I'm a more recent fan of Symphony X. The first album I bought was Paradise Lost and it had a few tracks I really dug.
But it did not effect me like the other albums I found out about.
Though when I found out about the old stuff, I thought it was AMAZING and truly I could see what Symphony X became known for.
Absolutely incredible when I listen to track like the The Odyssey, King Of Terrors, Evolution (The Grand Design), Smoke and Mirrors, Rediscovery Part 1&2, A Fool's Paradise, Pharoah, Accolade.
Just incredible tracks that I want to hear so bad when I see them live. But now is looks like it's not going to happen, which I'm not trying to tell the guys what to do, I was just really looking forward to hearing the old tracks.
I like some of the new stuff, it just hasn't had a effect on me like the old stuff.
To me these past two albums sounds too much a like.
Yes. There's some good stuff, but I prefer the old stuff.
Imagine the sound of V or the Odyssey (album based around these albums), with a more a modern production.
It would be too awesome.
I'm really hoping these guys will return to the old albums, and the way they sounded. Such a great mix of musicality.
I cannot fucking believe how some of you slag the band on THEIR OWN forum! They are a fucking metal band! They are sounding the way they are supposed to sound. Like a metal band. I'm sorry I ever posted on this forum, I'm sorry SX has to deal with fairweather fans, and I'm sorry a lot of you have no fucking manners. What a bunch of crybabies! I'm done with this forum. I hope none of you miss me because I won't miss any of you. Except for Sauna. At least he has class.
The truth hurts. Doesn't it?Hmmm... this post was probably the rudest of them all.