Manic Ferocity
Active Member
- Nov 5, 2006
- 5,280
- 559
- 113
Yeah well, disregarding your description, I won't be checking that out for two very presumptuous and shallow reasons (which are, regardless, usually correct assumptions).
1. The cover art sucks.
2. Newer material from 80s/early 90s thrash is more likely to suck than probably any other genre I've ever seen. I really can't think of one single thrash band that had a good album in their later years.
Bonus reason: Annihilator were always third rate thrash anyway.
1. The cover art sucks.
2. Newer material from 80s/early 90s thrash is more likely to suck than probably any other genre I've ever seen. I really can't think of one single thrash band that had a good album in their later years.
Bonus reason: Annihilator were always third rate thrash anyway.