for those that they are rebooting now they allready had the bad movie (imo) so I'll gladly take the chance to see a better one. Worked with Hulk for me, altho most critics thought it was worse then the older one.
i thought re-booting a "bad" movie was the whole freaking reason for doing a "re-boot", why would you re-boot a "good" movie, instead of just making an actual sequel?
And (at least for the spiderman rebbot) it doesn't look like they're doing the same movie again, since there's some other nemsis involved then in the first series. And leaving out the beginning also seems weird to me, so as long as it gets covered but doesnt take half of the movie it's good for me.
the nemisis in this new movie is a man-sized reptile that's accidently created when the guy with amputated arm tries to make it grow back the way that some lizards can grow back amputated limbs, the man with the amputated arm actually appears in the first trillogy, played by a different actor, this man-sized lizard creature was supposed to appear in the 3rd spiderman movie, but was replaced by sandman at the last possible minute
I don't know enough about Daredevil to know what they can do different with the reboot, i loved the daredevil moviebut Im generally not that much interested in that one.i'm pissed at this one, the daredevil movie didn't really need a re-boot, the movie ended in a way where everyone was expecting a sequel, and daredevil is just going to get re-booted again when the character rights go back to Disney, so that Disney can have every single fucking hero character Marvel makes all living in the same goddam "movie universe"
But I think in the first one the background story got covered also quite short, IIRC?
