I find it concerning Pat that you have issues with theatrical stuff yet one of your favorite eras of Tull was all about theatrics... as well as Floyd. I love theatrics incorperated and/or evolving into a concept and thus why Im pretty much progressive music or die. Yet I also love the blues which makes much of the presentation of being down on ones luck or upbeat stuff which makes much of the celebration of living.
Oh, I don't have "issues" per se with theatricality. On the contrary, I often enjoy it, and I stated somewhere in that sermon of mine that I object to the continual disregard of music by scholars because of its supposedly "theatrical" nature. I also don't know for certain if cheesiness always spawns from theatricality; I'm asking people to debate the issue. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise.
Furthermore, maybe all art contains some minute form of theatricality, no? Maybe
everything is cheesy to some degree.
I'm of the belief that the theatricality of Floyd's
The Wall is actually beneficial to the record and a commentary on the ideas of the "cult of the rock star" and popular culture itself. I'm sure everyone knows the famous story of the crazed fan climbing over the mesh netting to try and touch his idols at one of Floyd's arena concerts. Waters, disgusted with the fan, spat in his face. This event, in my opinion, presents us quite literally with the separation between the artist/artwork and the audience. Waters was disgusted by the voyeuristic fascination that this person had with the band/music. It places the stars upon a pedestal that produces a negative reaction from mass culture (this is similar to Walter Benjamin's idea that in the current age art has become a means to aestheticize politics).
This event partially inspired Waters to write
The Wall. The theatricality and extravagance of that record mirrors the insane extravagance we assign to popular icons such as Pink Floyd or other celebrities (not so much Floyd anymore as Kim Kardashian and Lauren Conrad). Floyd is commenting partly on popular culture's fascination with those we deem "artists" (some who perhaps truly are, others who we assign bloated importance to).
So, in the case of
The Wall, I truly believe that the theatricality plays an integral part.
My drawing of a dragon is just as much art as your twelve-foot phallic obelisk--and mine is probably more likely to be enjoyed by an observer.
Hey, you took a modern art class.
I personally don't believe that whether or not an observer enjoys piece of creative art is irrelevant and should not be a point considered by the artist. I don't take this into consideration when I compose my own music. I write what I would like to hear, not what I think others would. So composition for the observer's pleasure is not the purpose of art (in my opinion). I still do believe that your picture of a dragon can be just as artistic as a twelve-foot phallic obelisk though; I just think it has to be drawn for more than the sake of drawing a dragon. Again, personal opinion.