J.
Old Fart
Originally posted by 7 Dying Trees
Scientifically speaking something is not proven to be true untill you cannot disprove it. As you are measuring a quantity/object and questioning it's existance then you have to prove it exists, not prove that it doesn't. If we were all presumed guilty untill proved innocent then that wouldn't be any good now would it? Not digging in to you or anything, it's just that unless someone can conclusively prove the existance of a supreme being then I personally am not going to believe in one (and even then...)
Thank you for posting this. This is exactly what I debate with others, when they want to. It is fault of mankind (in my opinion) that everything is based on science. If man would let things just BE and not try to understand things, maybe we would be better off. (Gee, I can't wait for all the bashing I'm gonna get for this one)