Controversial opinions on metal

[MrTagoMago]

Now I'm just confused.

 

[Phylactery]

How did she manage that? I can't imagine she did something interesting/controversial enough to get her banned.

This post is confusing. Are you referring to HamburgerBoy here? Because if so, HBB is male not female.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

It clearly states in the law that:

A. Unlicensed distribution an copy of a sound recording is copyright infringement.

B. Obtaining a copy of a sound recording that is distributed in an unauthorized way is copyright infringement.

Due to his request for me to copy and paste relevant sections, those are included in that quote.

Could you specifically point out where it says that regarding your point 'B'? "Distribute" appears only twice in the portion quoted, and both cases refer to a person distributing illegally, not obtaining a sound recording via an illegal distribution. I.e. the criminality of the act rests on the uploader/distributor, not the downloader.

 

[rusty water]

Some women cant see the difference between the xbox 360 and the xbox one.You know, like the frame rate, detail and textures. To them its like ` havent you already got this game with cars racing around? A woman wont understand Ozzy. I mean a Woman with a legit opinion on Ozzy is a bit like a Dog that walks around on its hinder legs, very rare. Just saying. But I wish there were some who do understand.

 

[Internally Deformed]

This post is confusing. Are you referring to HamburgerBoy here? Because if so, HBB is male not female.

No, Elric/Omni. HBB's anecdote about wearing the same worn through pair of cargo pants throughout the entirety of high school clued me in to his gender pretty early on.

 

[Internally Deformed]

Some women cant see the difference between the xbox 360 and the xbox one.You know, like the frame rate, detail and textures. To them its like ` havent you already got this game with cars racing around? A woman wont understand Ozzy. I mean a Woman with a legit opinion on Ozzy is a bit like a Dog that walks around on its hinder legs, very rare.

Troll is obvious.

 

[Phylactery]

Krow said: HBB is the one that made her leave originally, chip is firmly on her shoulder.

You said: How did she manage that?

Which sounds like you are saying how did HBB make her leave, but you are referring to HBB as she. I don't know, maybe I'm just way too tired.

 

[Internally Deformed]

Krow said: HBB is the one that made her leave originally, chip is firmly on her shoulder.

You said: How did she manage that?

Which sounds like you are saying how did HBB make her leave, but you are referring to HBB as she. I don't know, maybe I'm just way too tired.

It actually read how did he manage that at first, but then MrTago posted that he was confused, so I read back through my post and got confused myself about the he/she thing and edited it, and now I've confused you.

I blame Elric for the gender confusion.

 

[rusty water]

Troll is obvious.

mr.Internally Deformed you appear to be obsessed with the word `Troll`. For some reason I shall endeavour to pinpoint you have to regularly assign the word `Troll` to posters whom join in the discussion.

 

[Internally Deformed]

mr.Internally Deformed you appear to be obsessed with the word `Troll`. For some reason I shall endeavour to pinpoint you have to regularly assign the word `Troll` to posters whom join in the discussion.

Yeah maybe, or maybe you're just a troll.

 

[Phylactery]

I hope it is a troll tbh. Never heard someone define "underground" as "grannies haven't heard of them" before.

 

[rusty water]

Yeah maybe, or maybe you're just a troll.

I was reading your latest ten page arguement idiocy with the guy who was presenting clear facts to you, once again, tonight. You go from that to calling a person a `Troll` twice.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

No, Elric/Omni. HBB's anecdote about wearing the same worn through pair of cargo pants throughout the entirety of high school clued me in to his gender pretty early on.

what about the fact that his username is hamburgerBOY?

 

[Elric of Melniboné]

Could you specifically point out where it says that regarding your point 'B'? "Distribute" appears only twice in the portion quoted, and both cases refer to a person distributing illegally, not obtaining a sound recording via an illegal distribution. I.e. the criminality of the act rests on the uploader/distributor, not the downloader.

The first subsection in the article where it lists conditions under which a sound recording may be obtained without it being an infringing act. Here it clearly states that the first requirement is that the source of the material must not be an infringing copy of the material.

Due to the fact that making a copy to distribute without license makes that copy an infringing copy of the material, this is obvious. When you download something from someone else, you make a copy of a file that they have for yourself on your computer's drive, as described here.

• 29.22 (1) It is not an infringement of copyright for an individual to reproduce a work or other subject-matter or any substantial part of a work or other subject-matter if
  • (a) the copy of the work or other subject-matter from which the reproduction is made is not an infringing copy.

 

[Internally Deformed]

I was reading your latest ten page arguement idiocy with the guy who was presenting clear facts to you, once again, tonight. You go from that to calling a person a `Troll` twice.

Not sure if you're referencing TB or Elric here, but either way you be trollin (that makes three).

what about the fact that his username is hamburgerBOY?

Rght, because he's a boy who likes hamburgers.

Well shit, maybe he is a boy who likes hamburgers.

 

[TechnicalBarbarity]

The first subsection in the article where it lists conditions under which a sound recording may be obtained without it being an infringing act. Here it clearly states that the first requirement is that the source of the material must not be an infringing copy of the material.

Due to the fact that making a copy to distribute without license makes that copy an infringing copy of the material, this is obvious. When you download something from someone else, you make a copy of a file that they have for yourself on your computer's drive, as described here.

• 29.22 (1) It is not an infringement of copyright for an individual to reproduce a work or other subject-matter or any substantial part of a work or other subject-matter if
  • (a) the copy of the work or other subject-matter from which the reproduction is made is not an infringing copy.

... and the 12th and final(hopefully) round begins

 

[rusty water]

Not sure if you're referencing TB or Elric here, but either way you be trollin (that makes three).



Rght, because he's a boy who likes hamburgers.

Well shit, maybe he is a boy who likes hamburgers.

Yeah youre not sure because you argue and argue with people whom present clear facts to you, Probably youve had several tonight, but to help you a little I was referring to your very latest one, where you argue against facts like a Dunce.

 

[Internally Deformed]

You'd think if they wanted piracy to be illegal they'd just write something like: "owning a copy of a recording without having paid for said recording is illegal".

I guess not.

 

[Internally Deformed]

Yeah youre not sure because you argue and argue with people whom present clear facts to you, Probably youve had several tonight, but to help you a little I was referring to your very latest one, where you argue against facts like a Dunce.

So wait, what fact is it you're presenting again? I've lost track.

 

[rusty water]

So wait, what fact is it you're presenting again? I've lost track.

I aint getting in a ten page arguement with a Dunce.