meaperson333
Thrasher
- Jul 20, 2010
- 307
- 1
- 16
Exodus shouldn't even be talked about, they're pretty bad.
Your arguement is invalid.
Last edited by a moderator:
Exodus shouldn't even be talked about, they're pretty bad.
Can't we just agree on Anthrax sucking?
Okey, here's a new one for you
Nile hasn't written a single memorable song.
I like Belladonna-Anthrax quite a bit. They are a little uneven but man when they are good they are really good. I love Among the Living.
Kafir
Album release date doesn't mean everything, especially with Exodus where most of Bonded By Blood has been written by the time of Show No Mercy's release, as well as a decent portion of Pleasures of the Flesh in 1985. Metallica had two albums out by then (one of which has two revived Exodus songs from 1982/early 1983) but Exodus at the time doesn't sound much like them.
Pleasures didn't break any new ground, yeah, but neither did the releases of the second-tier bands you listed. Death Angel, Overkill, Protector, and Sacrifice are blatantly obvious examples of unoriginal mid-80's releases.
Metallica, yes. Slayer, sort of. Megadeth too. Which others?
Death Angel was around and could arguably have released The Ultra-Violence a year earlier with more exposure, the same for Coroner, Destruction, Artillery, etc. These bands formed in 82 (excluding Coroner), but it's not like they all were getting Exodus/Metallica demos/albums and then writing material.
Nile hasn't written a single memorable song.
Can't we just agree on Anthrax sucking?
IMO Exodus should've replaced Anthrax in the big four.
Akercocke sucks.
UNAS FEASTETH ON THEIR ENTRAILS!
Okey, here's a new one for you
Nile hasn't written a single memorable song.
I always thought it was about the most influential/first thrash bands.
Nah, or Overkill would be one of them.