ProphetofHatred
We boogie on the floor
- Dec 17, 2013
- 3,586
- 266
- 83
Only them? What about Dust, Cactus, Leaf Hound, Atomic Rooster, Fresh Blueberry Pancake, Uriah Heep, Paladin, Night Sun, etc
Controversial opinion: I think the rise of thrash in the 80's, 'crash' of thrash in the mid 90's, and the renewal of thrash in the mid 00's, had a lot to do with the political climate in the U.S. during those years.
In general at least the politically driven side of thrash is fairly liberal and anti-war I think.
Thrash started in about '81 or '82 around the same time Reagan took office.
Thrash essentially 'crashed' in 1993, the same year Clinton took office.
Thrash came back in about 2003, the same year Bush jr. started the Iraq war version 2.0 after 9/11.
Controversial opinion: I think the rise of thrash in the 80's, 'crash' of thrash in the mid 90's, and the renewal of thrash in the mid 00's, had a lot to do with the political climate in the U.S. during those years.
In general at least the politically driven side of thrash is fairly liberal and anti-war I think.
Thrash started in about '81 or '82 around the same time Reagan took office.
Thrash essentially 'crashed' in 1993, the same year Clinton took office.
Thrash came back in about 2003, the same year Bush jr. started the Iraq war version 2.0 after 9/11.
Yeah but you also listen to vanilla ass Tech Death.
lol, wtf is vanilla tech-death?
i don't find classic heavy metal that impressive, this includes deep purple, Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Iron Maiden
This isn't controversial at all. Just silly.
lol, wtf is vanilla tech-death?
Sterile death metal littered with picking band sweeps. I would think you'd know, given it's your favorite thing ever.