It is my opinion that we have remained friendly with Israel for military reasons. Strategically, Israel is a great place to be if the need to go after a terrorist nation arises. Is it possible that the US is building permanent bases in Iraq so that we do not have to be so friendly to Israel?
There aren't now but, there were. (see Syria)
So in theory, we should bomb Syria rather then Iran considering the fact they have Mr. Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction?
That didn’t help me out, it didn’t help the United States either.
They don’t want a government based on that of the West…even if they did why should we give that to them?
They certainly aren't acting like it.
Then lets get out of their and leave them to themselves.
It seems that way now because terrorists are posing as insurgents.
You kill one, and then another one comes, if we are in their land they have the upper hand which is obvious, but in here in the United States they don't stand a chance at all.
Losing even one soldier is too many. However, we don't pull out once we hit a certain #.
So, if our soldiers were outnumbered 5 to 1, you wouldn’t suggesting pulling out? Furthermore, explain to me why we shouldn’t leave these people to their own government…it isn’t our job to build their nation.
I would rather see the money invested in a border fence.
Same here…a wall would be better though.
We don't have to worry about the southern border. Papajosh has that covered.
Yes we do…we don’t need another 9/11 on our hands.
Also, don’t believe the cheap campaign rhetoric of the democrats when they claim they will ‘pull out’ of Iraq when they can’t even prevent a troop surge initiated by the executive branch. It isn’t like they ever had any intention to do that in the first place…it just sounds good for the ill-informed voter.