Kate Bush Rules! said:
Mr. Kate Bush Rules!...
Lay off man. Give these people a break. You come here, which is fine, but bring an opinion opposite to the masses, what do you expect? Anyways, where is it written, your definition progressive metal? What about what you call symphonic metal? Is that not progressive metal, when looking back to the founders of prog?
Posting Symphony X is only a power metal band is way wrong, but then you go a step further and include bands like Opeth and Tool as progressive, all I've got to say is that you got issues man. Yes they are progressive, but to see their progressiveness and not Sym X's, it just drives me looney.
Also, InsideOut refers to Symphony X just the same as we do. They
correctly place them among not one, but three seperate genres. Progressive, symphonic, AND power. Talk about stupidity alert. What farm did you grow up on? How can you see the progressiveness in Tool, but not see it in Symphony X? And where the heck do you get that album to album crap from? What I mean is, what basis? I know the ins and outs of prog history like the back of my hand, and what your saying just isn't adding up.
This is not 1976, or 1984. It's 2003 duder. Progressive no longer fits into a box. Zero Hour, Sun Caged, Chrome Shift, Ark, Ion Vein, Dali's Dilemma, Silent Edge, Dreamscape, Evergrey, Gracepoint, Pagans Mind, Pathos, Rough Silk, Paynes Gray, Scudiero, Secret Sphere, and Derek Sherinian all fall into the catagory of progressive metal, no matter that they may have elements of power metal, death metal, hard rock, what ever. Geez, man! Don't you see? Symphony X is
ONE OF THE BEST EXAMPLES OF PROGRESSIVE METAL. If you cannot understand why it's said, if you cannot see how, then I just don't know what else to say.
They began as a progressive metal band taking the genre where it had never gone, and they still are doing just that.