If you are going to talk about science and try to explain things scientifically, at least get your facts straight.
Funny enough, you revealed yourself with this:
people think as if islam has a policy on what to do with semitism or infidelity.
...And I'm calling the bullshit flag. You see, it is not my words that destroy belief, but your own. I'm sorry.
As to the rest, I consider your judgment impaired. You have not taken it seriously to know it in completion, but if you did then I have to scoff because of the balls it takes to deny such an observation.
Tell you what. Apply these rules to your life as an experiment for a week, and see the chaos erupt.
- Next time you don't want to do something, any time in the week, just do it. Forget the second guesses, just do it. You go to the store and think of running, just do it rather than set it aside.
- When you hear things, believe them immediately, but know that it is a 2 stage process. With knowledge, you can have faith in that truth. With faith alone, we have blind error erupting from people caught in the act. Catch them in the act, and believe them knowing the entire truth will show up.
- Whenever you feel weak, just think back to Palpatine in Star Wars III when he screams "UNLIMITED POWER!!" and believe it knowing wisdom will occur.
There's lots of things you can do to your life that can directly influence your environment. Thought can only be processed through action, so the more you blend colors together, or rather change the color of your thoughts, the more unique the result of that equation.
You should try it.
You'd better hurry the fuck up and give us some good arguments, because you are losing all credibility right now.
And what if I don't? What are you gonna do if I leave you hangin? Technically I should leave it as it is so you can get reading, but rather than bore you, I WILL respond to any question you wish. I will draw wisdom for you.
Thus far, I find myself at a loss of where to start. I will await your suggestion.
Expand what you know about Islam's policy on anti-semitism and infidelity.
I was making a statement of what I felt at the time. To be honest I was just racking my brain when I said it, but since it came out I will defend it.
I believe that religious war is a coming. I think the farmers are coming to stir up a hornets nest. It doesn't matter what you believe, those who DO believe will find themselves at a loss with the truth when it is revealed. Do they continue hope? Do they fight this arrogance and lies?
Ask yourself "What exactly DOES it take to do such a thing? What connections can I make here, for error or for truth?" and the answers come naturally.
i'd like to think chemistry and physics have advanced since Empedocles
I've never read his work. But if he writes in similar fashion then perhaps we have literally regressed to a lower extent of science. I believe, as no doubt this Empedocles would believe, that science today describes what can best be compared to the circuit functions of nature. An Assembly Mnemonic is the digital representation of the corresponding impulses, but they're 2 different concepts altogether.
Compare and extrapolate.
Water. Earth. Wind. Fire. Great, you call yourself Christian yet try to explain God with notions that have been the domain of paganism and furthermore are far outdated.
Earth is no element: It's a heterogenous mix of many elements and takes many forms.
Water is no element. H2O itself isn't. It's a molecule made of 2 elements.
Wind is no element. It's a mix of different elements and particles in gaseous form upon which a kinetic force is applied.
Fire is no element. It's a visual byproduct of an exotherm chemical reaction.
I'm the golden bull they sculpted at the base of Sinai. No religion describes my beliefs.
Also, see above on those last couple of lines. And I said "Fluid-LIKE", not actual fluid. Actually, every one of those elements, when observed in nature, operate the exact same ways on the same base principles. Ripples, flames, vibrations and wind all generate a frequency that is conducted through their respective origins.
And yes, that observation is moot but interesting nonetheless. Useful to the conversation, perhaps...
What the heck did you mean, Resonator?
I mean it how see it, and though sometimes I write incoherently I try my hardest to stay within extremely literal terms. The way you would normally expect a word to mean is how it means when I say it. And I will watch that video, but tomorrow.