Yeah... the universe is kinda big though, I figure maybe my descendants can work out what to do about the 'universe all used up' issue.
fixing animals
- Thread starter JoeVice
- Start date
Yeah... the universe is kinda big though, I figure maybe my descendants can work out what to do about the 'universe all used up' issue.
Thoth-Amon
Hypochondriac
- Apr 4, 2006
- 6,821
- 8
- 38
yeah who knows... i'm not totally serious about neutering and spaying everyone you know... i'm just following an idea here... but hey we need to do something drastic
yah, something drastic does need to be done, and i think it will be done no matter what, whether its by us or the flowers, and for the best or worst (for humanity).
but, i certainly don't think that overpopulation is the problem that your'e saying it is. i think the problems are right where you are, always, and what your doing. if you think overpopulation is a problem, make sure to be smart about it. but, its not for you to decide for other people. its their sexuality. and, whats the big problem if "dumb" people breed? whats really important?
but, i certainly don't think that overpopulation is the problem that your'e saying it is. i think the problems are right where you are, always, and what your doing. if you think overpopulation is a problem, make sure to be smart about it. but, its not for you to decide for other people. its their sexuality. and, whats the big problem if "dumb" people breed? whats really important?
so basically, you're saying that plants aren't evil because they lack the comunication ability neccassary for evil-ness? plant's don't comunicate at all whatsoever, that's elementary-school-level bio, man
because sterilizing the people that shouldn't breed would be more humane, more PC, and more feaseable
yah, basically.
*edit* actually, what i'm trying to say is humans aren't evil either. we're just able to communicate our awareness of pain and darkness. lawnmowers are louder than the cries of grass.
# 1 doesn't work in USA killing the people that shouldn't breed won't work here because america's been Christian-ized to the point that the majority of the people will object to it because of the Biblical edict "thou shalt not kill"
#2 seems the best because #1 and #3 are simply not feasable
#3 is not feasable because 95% of the planet is "religious" in some way or another, in the parts of the world that don't have internet access, overpopulation is problematic because "sex" almost always involves penis-ejaculating-into-vagina sex,(without contraceptives) this is because, in most religions, it is believed that when semen enters a woman's body, there is some sort of deity controling whether or not the female becomes impregnated from that encounter, so for a lot of people using contraceptives would be "cheating fate"
#4 just souds stupid, overpopulation problems won't go away, there are a lot of homosexuals, men who have sex with plastic dolls instead of people, people who have sex with animals etc etc etc, but this is inconsequential compared to the extreme hugeness of the overpopulation problem that exists right now
with our comunication skills, humans are capable of being much more evil than the animal that merely claws you.
is that what you were trying to say?
???
killing people is physically feasable, (biologically speaking, humans are a very easy to kill species) but killing all the people that shouldn't breed, (killing them as a group) wouldn't be feasable, because the masses wouldn't let it happen
i know some people that shouldn't breed, including myself right now.
if you know you shouldn't breed, then should we stertilize you? or kill you? the sterilizing thing seems more humane, right?
yah, in fact, i'll add that to the list of things i need to do. (sterilizing) i'm sure i can just google it and find out everything i need to know.
i didn't mean to be instructing you to sterilize yourself
i just meant
sterilizing people that shouldn't breed >>>>>> killing people that shouldn't breed
BlackMetalWhiteGuy
Manly Man!
I can understand why one might suggest mass sterilization of humans, but I can see a few issues that would arise from such a practice. First of all, what authority decides who should or should not reproduce? Secondly, I doubt that very many people could be convinced that they belong in the "should not" category and would come up with one excuse after another in their own defense. Essentially, I think most people would only support mass sterilization to the extent that their own civil rights aren't violated in the process. Even if 100% of the population thought it was a good idea at first, the moment we decided to only let 40% of them reproduce, 60% would suddenly become consciencious objectors.
hmmm...maybe you should go stupid people should not be able to reproduce.
this is just why it didn't happen yet, doesn't really make it really bad idea
