Get this...

Lina

kickass elizabethan style
May 2, 2001
11,119
12
38
45
Maryland, U.S.
Visit site
OK, you officially deserve the title of stupid cunt.

Rather than respond to my post on Jannet's African-American thread (a post I spent a good half-hour on, mind you :p), she deleted the thread. Very mature.

That's now how a message board works. It's time for you to go.
 
Lina, why the hell would I want to respond to what you had to say? You ripped to shreds everything, EVERYTHING I said. And, oh my, if I had responded, I would have gotten - "well, since you were on welfare, you're too stupid to understand about African Americans - oh, and did I mention you're not an ideal parent?"

And I have the option to delete my thread if that's my wish. Or is the big, blaring:

"Delete? To delete this post, check the box to the left and then click the button to the right.
Note: deleting this post will result in the deletion of the entire thread if this post is the first post in the thread. "

I guess it's just a decoration.
 
Originally posted by Jannet
Lina, why the hell would I want to read what you had to say? You ripped to shreds everything, EVERYTHING I said.

fo·rum (fôrm, fr-)
n. pl. fo·rums, also fo·ra (fôr, fr)
A public meeting place for open discussion.
 
Originally posted by dune_666


fo·rum (fôrm, fr-)
n. pl. fo·rums, also fo·ra (fôr, fr)
A public meeting place for open discussion.

Since I mentioned that what she wrote completely tore to shreds my thoughts on the subject, I was a bit contradictive. I will go fix.
 
So when you don't agree with someone, you just delete the thread? You're pathetic.

I have not made a single racist or condescending remark about you being on welfare. Up until this thread, I had never stooped to name-calling either. In fact, I've complimented you for getting off welfare.

But I suppose if you actually read my responses, you wouldn't be able to keep that big-ass chip on your shoulder.
 
Originally posted by Lina
So when you don't agree with someone, you just delete the thread? You're pathetic.

I have not made a single racist or condescending remark about you being on welfare. Up until this thread, I had never stooped to name-calling either. In fact, I've complimented you for getting off welfare.

But I suppose if you actually read my responses, you wouldn't be able to keep that big-ass chip on your shoulder.

Lina, I'm REALLY not trying to argue, but did you forget that you told me, quite frankly, that I was "not an ideal parent."? Must I search for it? I'm sure you remember when you said this. No, I know you haven't made any racist remarks, I never said you did. Also, why are you complimenting me for getting off it? I was only on for a short time, and since I don't see anything wrong with receiving assistance when you need it, and then when you get on your feet to cut off that assistance, I don't see how this is something to take pride in. What I took pride in was going to college and getting a better job. Try to look at it in my shoes, please. If you were in my sitation (most likely you'll never be, but you never know), and for some reason or the other you needed financial assistance at a point in your life, and you received it from the only source you could, which was welfare, and then once you were up on your feet, you got off it anyway because you didn't want to be on welfare in the first place, and you tell someone you hardly know, "I was on welfare for a short while because I needed assistance, but I got off on my own accord - but I hated being on welfare, even for a short while", and this person says, "I'm so proud of you for getting off welfare", how would you take this? Just take a minute to think about it. And why would you think I did not have a college fund for my son? You assumed that because I mentioned that my parents didn't have one for me, that I was continuing a cycle. I think your words were "You don't strike me as someone who would have a college fund set up for her kid" (or very close to it, I'm trying to remember). Don't you think these things are offensive? Don't you think that I would be hurt by these remarks? And then, and I'm sorry to bring this up, the problem basically started when, (and you yourself acknowledged this), butted into an argument to put your two cents in about what I was saying. You acknowledged it! "butting in, butting out", remember? And you said that you thought you shouldn't even be doing it!

Damn, this has become quite long winded, but this is my beef with you. I truly am sorry if I insulted you in any possible way. I truly am.
 
Jannet: oh, and did I mention you're not an ideal parent?"

It's obvious that if these words were used how you took them that it'd be a huge insult. But, after countless times of Lina explaining her actual meaning in detail, you continue to hold that as a sole reason to...continue this charade. :err:

The evening trees moan as if they knew.
 
Originally posted by Jannet


Lina, I'm REALLY trying to argue, but did you forget that quite frankly, I was "not an ideal parent. Must I search for racist remarks, Also, why are you getting off on receiving assistance when your feet don't take pride in going to college and getting a better shoes, please. If you were in my feet, you got welfare in someone you hardly know, "I was on welfare for a while because I needed welfare, even for a while", and this person says, "I'm so getting off welfare", how would you take a minute to think about my son? You assumed that my parents continuing a cycle. I think your words were "You strike me as someone who would have up her kid" Don't you think things are offensive? Don't you think that I hurt an argument to put your two cents in butting in, butting out thought you shouldn't even be it!

Damn, my beef insulted you.

Beef insults me.
 
Originally posted by Opet
Jannet: oh, and did I mention you're not an ideal parent?"

It's obvious that if these words were used how you took them that it'd be a huge insult. But, after countless times of Lina explaining her actual meaning in detail, you continue to hold that as a sole reason to...continue this charade. :err:

The evening trees moan as if they knew.

No, dear. Where you got this quote I don't know, but this is how it really went:

quote:

Originally posted by Jannet
And it's really hard to not be there for your kids when you have to have two jobs to make ends meet! Do you have any idea how much daycare costs these days? Lots of money. In addition to all the bills of the house, food, rent/mortgage, entertainment, sports, etc?

Lina: Exactly. So why did you have a child when you weren't financially secure? I recall you saying you were on welfare. Where's all this common sense you claim to have?

Originally posted by Jannet
How do hell do you know I wasn't financially secure when I had my child? You have no idea when I needed the assistance (1 year, 2 years, 3 years later, hmm?). You have no idea what my current living situation was.

Lina: I think your son is 8, correct? And seeing as how you're 31 now (right?), and you've just recently achieved financial security (I believe you said this), I'm assuming your child and your welfare payments overlapped at some point. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. At any rate, even if you weren't on welfare when you had him, you obviously weren't financially secure. So why did you have him? Did you think it was your right to have a child? Did you think you could raise him on "unconditional love"? Don't laud parents who work two jobs to feed their children. They shouldn't have kids if they can't afford them. And no, simply clothing and feeding them does not a parent make.

Originally posted by Jannet
Where does common sense play in your argument? Are you saying that a person on welfare doesn't have common sense?

Lina: Yes.

quote:

Originally posted by Jannet
Not all parents are financially secure when they have a child. Unexpected expenses can come up (even middle class/rich people may have this problem - think 2nd mortgage?) And there are parents that are financially secure when they have the child but because of unexpected things that happen can become financially insecure AFTER they have the kid.

Lina: Yes, all of this is true. But it's not your story, is it?

Originally posted by Jannet
Really? How you figure this? Why would you think I wasn't financially secure when I had him? I would like to know...

Lina: Let's see, you've told us that you've had some very hard times financially in your adult life. You struggled to provide for your child. You are finally in a good job (which I take to mean you've had lots of shitty jobs). And you have yet to explain otherwise. So just admit that you weren't financially ready to have a child. Then again, we probably have different definitions of "financially ready," since you strike me as the type that probably doesn't have a college fund set up for him yet.


quote:

Originally posted by Jannet

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, all of this is true. But it's not your story, is it? And it doesn't negate the fact that someone in forseeable dire financial straits shouldn't have kids.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why would you think it's not my story? I would like to know. And no, it doesn't negate the forseeable dire financial straits, that's why I said "UNEXPECTED."

Lina: You somehow always manage to mangle everything everyone says. I'm not talking about negating the financial straits -- I'm saying unexpected financial upset suffered by some upper-class family doesn't negate the fact that people on (or close to being on) welfare shouldn't have children.

Sheesh. I think your plan of attack here is to exasperate people into not arguing with you.
quote:

Originally posted by Jannet
No Lina. I haven't tried to attack anyone. You've implied that I'm some lacking common sense welfare has-been that doesn't give a shit about her kid (i.e., "since you strike me as the type that probably doesn't have a college fund set up for him yet"). How dare you?

Lina: Well, have you set up a fund? I'm not saying you're an awful parent, just not an ideal parent. And I wouldn't be saying anything at all if you didn't go around yapping like you're fucking brilliant.

I didn't want to be on welfare, but I had no choice! I was on for about 7 months, and that's it! I took the opportunity to go to college at this time and worked on my education!

Lina: I commend you for going to college, I really do. You got your life together, and for that you should be congratulated.

quote:
I didn't have a parent that had any college fund ready for me, so I had to struggle and bust my ass to get what I wanted!

Lina: And yet, you're repeating the same mistakes your parents made. And you still don't see the correlation. What a shame, the cycle shall continue.

Quote:
This is all it's been. One big fucking argument with three separate people. I don't WANT to argue.

Lina: And what (or who) has been the common denominator of these fights?
 
Jeez,

am I the only one annoyed with this crap?

Send each other some PMs clarify the situation, rectify it by sending each other flowers and dildoes for Feb14, and stop this nonsense.

I wish some moderator would close some of the threads.
 
Sorry Raoul, but if you were so annoyed, you wouldn't keep posting. And since Opet decided to ignore EVERYTHING that preceded the comment he just posted (where is this comment by the way?) to make me look like an idiot, I feel that this needed some clarification.