It still amazes me how he made it, given all the obstacles that came his way... *phew*rahvin said:but he bathed in the light of a newfound pride for his own survival skills.
rahvin.
It still amazes me how he made it, given all the obstacles that came his way... *phew*rahvin said:but he bathed in the light of a newfound pride for his own survival skills.
rahvin.
At least we got a free beer out of it, JoeDmanx Pit said:I went to Nile and Napalm Death for Dark Tranquillity only. I like all those bands on the tour, but I probably would have skipped it and worked instead if DT^ weren't on the bill.
So that was $20 for a 5 song DT set.
Siren said:It still amazes me how he made it, given all the obstacles that came his way... *phew*
now, why does that ring a bell? oh, that's right: Stockholm!RealHazard said:If I´d want to see a gig, I´d had to:
-Travel to Helsinki (by train 25 EUR?) or somewhere.
-Buy a ticket
-Get back to home (by train 25 EUR?)
Episode666 said:That's how I end up in the People Who Think They're Special sections, Wildfyr. My secret is out.
plfffffft said:At least we got a free beer out of it, Joe
Heh, what happened was that me and DmanX(I'm pretty sure its you) were hanging out at the back of the Troc in Philly after the Nile show, talking to whoever came out, when one of the roadies came out and just gave us a few beers. It wouldn't be that funny if I was old enough to drink, but, considering I"m 19, I found it quite humorous.wildfyr said:i didn't see this before i posted my last post here. hehe
Rebecca (lunch break!)
Now, let's not get snotty. I didn't get in that show for free on your tab. There isn't anything wrong with showing hospitality, and what you did in Milwaukee was duly admirable. I'm positive you earned the same respect reserved for various beer gods that night.wildfyr said:In the past couple years I have brought "gifts" of many cases of beer to one band and one band only - In Flames - but I did it because I like those guys and I wanted to show my appreciation to them for working their butts off and touring really hard over here despite some not so ideal opening act situations.
I never expected anything in return for it though, but I'm happy to know you were able to make it a reciprocal situation for yourself.
Episode666 said:Now, let's not get snotty. I didn't get in that show for free on your tab. There isn't anything wrong with showing hospitality, and what you did in Milwaukee was duly admirable. I'm positive you earned the same respect reserved for various beer gods that night.
I never said anywhere that I'd *expect* a free pass - let me clarify. It simply goes along with where I happen to be at the time. Whether it's here doing 14 loads of laundry for a group of guys with absolutely nothing clean to wear; or dragging a few bags of fresh food, smokes and beer up to a bus. So I get invited into a show for free. Big deal.
Right here:wildfyr said:Erm, I don't recall ever accusing you of getting into any show on my tab. Where the hell did that come from?
but I'm happy to know you were able to make it a reciprocal situation for yourself.
*note to self - Rebecca senses clarifications as hostility*As for the expectations, I don't believe I ever said that you expected reprocity. And I didn't call you a cheat, either, so I don't know why I sense all this hostility from you.
I agree. If people only knew what these bands had to actually go through to come to their cities. In the USA, since I'm having such a hard time making myself clear today for some inane reason.Anyway, I'm thrilled that you help out. More people should!
Oh yeah! The good old days, where personal information was available about band members, flaming, hate speeches, more flaming, pick-your-favorite-reg polls, outright lies, rumors and......... boy, those were the days. *wipes eyes* Last that I recall, you had registered and posted at the unofficial forum too, oui? You do understand that registered members can start new threads and post to current topics, right? Just checking. Even the old forum went through periods of quiet. But, if it's that much of a yawner, why not start some new topics for people to participate in? Goodness.One thing though, you could probably try to kick-start that yawner of an Un-Official In Flames forum. Man, back in the days (heh) the Official board would be so FULL of posts about US show anticipations and reviews it would TOTALLY piss off all the old OLD original Swede and other Euro fans back home. Heh, the good ol' days... *rolls eyes*
Hey, it's your snot.Should I have been more snotty?
Episode666 said:Right here:
Episode666 said:*note to self - Rebecca senses clarifications as hostility*
Episode666 said:I agree. If people only knew what these bands had to actually go through to come to their cities. In the USA, since I'm having such a hard time making myself clear today for some inane reason.
Episode666 said:Oh yeah! The good old days, where personal information was available about band members, flaming, hate speeches, more flaming, pick-your-favorite-reg polls, outright lies, rumors and......... boy, those were the days. *wipes eyes* Last that I recall, you had registered and posted at the unofficial forum too, oui? You do understand that registered members can start new threads and post to current topics, right? Just checking. Even the old forum went through periods of quiet. But, if it's that much of a yawner, why not start some new topics for people to participate in? Goodness.
Episode666 said:Hey, it's your snot.
wildfyr said:whaaa? i tell you that i'm happy that you are able to work a situation like that to your advantage and that bothers you? sorry, i'm not grasping that one.
wildfyr said:One thing though, you could probably try to kick-start that yawner of an Un-Official In Flames forum. Man, back in the days (heh) the Official board would be so FULL of posts about US show anticipations and reviews it would TOTALLY piss off all the old OLD original Swede and other Euro fans back home. Heh, the good ol' days... *rolls eyes*
Episode666 said:Ya know what? Forget it. Forget I fucking said anything. Just fuck it.
rahvin said:i'm pretty sure i shouldn't poke my nose into things that do not concern me, but i'm going to do that anyway because i feel the burning need to put myself in unpleasant situations.
;o)
rahvin said:when you say something of the kind depicted above to a board administrator, rebecca, you ought to expect at least a not-very-pleased reaction, though of course i understand you weren't trying to place the blame or anything.
no. that i was not doing.
rahvin said:moderators are not board fairies that sprinkle threads with pixie dust to make them grow and multiply overnight. they have no control on the quantity/quality of posts, unless they resort to authoritative measures, that - for obvious reasons - hardly ever turn out in more people posting. once a forum is safe from abuse, that it becomes a yawner or a thriller is not really in the hands of those who keep watch. if most regulars stopped posting here what do you think i could do? register under 50 different nicknames and have deep philosophical debates with myself?
on the other hand, comments that seem to imply a mod is responsible for scarce activity on a board are likely to hurt, because in truth once you've spent your energies on making things run smoothly you don't really need to feel responsible for users posting rarely or posting inane things. moderators are not retailers that should make customers buy a product.
sometimes there are other things to do and care for, other obligations aside from the board that do not allow mods to come up with a new clown-ish number every day just to see more activity. and it's also hard to be reminded that more was expected out of you when other problems were knocking at your door.
rahvin.
i understand your concern, rahvin, but i think our definitions of mod might not be the same.