yep, the one who tells me he/she will lower gas prices, not raise taxes, get us out of iraq, lower health insurance, lower tuition costs, work on the stopping the wave of illegals, and not think gay cowboys are a threat to national security gets this duders vote
Senator Joe Biden.
Actually, even if Hilary becomes the democrat lead, the party itself will still use Biden's plans on Iraq since, you know, he's actually thought it through. This is what he published in November 2005:
POLITICAL SOLUTIONS
First, we need to build a political consensus, starting with the Constitution, that gives the Kurds, Shia, and Sunnis a stake in keeping Iraq together. Iraq cannot be salvaged by military might alone.
Last month, the Constitution passed overwhelmingly. But the vast majority of Sunni Arabs voted no. Unless changes are made by next spring, it will become a document that divides rather than unites Iraq.
All sides must compromise. Sunnis must accept the fact that they no longer rule Iraq. But unless Shiites and Kurds give them a stake in the new order, they will continue to resist it.
If the situation devolves into a full-blown civil war, all the kings horses and all the kings men wont be able to put Iraq back together again.
Does anyone here support using American troops to fight a civil war against the Sunnis on behalf of the Kurds and Shiites? I dont and I doubt many Americans would. But if we fail to forge a political consensus soon, that is what our troops will be dragged into.
The Bush Administration was AWOL until the arrival of Ambassador Khalilzad this summer. We let the Iraqis fend for themselves in writing a Constitution. In our absence, no headway was made.
We cant make those mistakes again. We need to be fully engaged. Next month, there is an election for the National Assembly, and I expect Sunnis to turn out in large numbers.
After the elections, we must turn our attention immediately to encouraging the Kurds and Shia to make genuine compromises.
Our Ambassador cant be the only one in the room cajoling Iraqis. We need a regional strategy that persuades Iraqs neighbors to wield their influence with the Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds for political compromise. They will do it, because no one other than the terrorists has an interest in Iraq descending into civil war.
The major powers also have a stake. Europe has un-integrated Muslim populations that are vulnerable to Middle East extremism. India and China need stable oil supplies.
Our Allies must get over bruised feelings and help forge a political consensus. We must get over our reluctance to fully involve them.
We should form a Contact Group that becomes Iraqs primary international interlocutor. That would take some of the burden off of us
and maximize the pressure on Iraqs main groups to compromise.
Ive called for a regional strategy and an international Contact Group repeatedly.
So have three former Republican Secretaries of State Shultz, Kissinger, and Powell.
Its what the Clinton Administration did in the Balkans. Its what this Administration did in Afghanistan. Organized, sustained international engagement can make all the difference.
But it will only happen if America leads.
website:
http://biden.senate.gov/index.cfm
Fucking slam dunk.
That said, I have no problem with Bill Clinton getting back into the white house, behind his wife or otherwise.