biggsy said:I appreciate what they've done for music, but personally I don't like their music.
Skyld said:I don't see why people are turds just for not liking a certain band. You can't FORCE yourself to like something.
It's those who say "i h8 the beetlez tehy am so borign!!11. tehri musix sux " who you should be flaming. Only an idiot can fail to respect what they've done for music in their time and ours.
dcowboys311 said:The Beatles did so much stuff that was ahead of their time it's not even funny. They are influential to almost every genre of music out there (?uestlove from The Roots said The Beatles influence him in a lot of stuff, Ozzy said that when he was a kid he adored The Beatles and they were one of his biggest influences, obvious influences in pop/rock, etc) and also were one of the forefathers of the concept album. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band is easily one of the top albums of all time.
Of course they were overhyped, especially to begin with. Beatlemania was a real thing, and it's a credit to them that they came out of that and managed to stay together and make different and inspired music for as long as they did before disintegrating. That you label their music 'basic' when it is so varied tells me that you know sweet fuck all about them. How many of their albums have you listened to from start to finish?Honestly I've always had a burning vicious hate for The Beatles. So overhyped and I don't feel they live up to it at all.
I don't necessarily hate basic music (I love black metal ffs), but I find 99.9% of their music lacks serious depth.
I enjoy the song "I Am The Walrus"... but that's it, and only because of nostalgia (one of the first rock songs I ever heard). Other than that, no fucking thanks.
Zappa is a legend... Why is there not a thread dedicated to him? Anyone?All the interesting stuff The Beatles did was done better by Frank Zappa & The Mothers, it took years for this to dawn on me.
Every now and then I listen to Let It Be though because I like the raw emotion on the record. In fact I think everybody's solo material outclasses The Beatles material by a great margin.
Their music is not basic; maybe by today's terms, but it provided a new outlet for musicians. At the time the jazz scene was getting out of hand to the point where there was almost no emotion and it was essentially just a bunch of musicians wanking over their instruments. From a technical standpoint they were good, but no musician is wholly good without emotion and jazz at that time had lost almost all of that, with exceptions here and there. The scene improved again later on, when jazz rock/fusion came around.I don't necessarily hate basic music (I love black metal ffs), but I find 99.9% of their music lacks serious depth.