EternalMetal
Active Member
- Mar 31, 2004
- 1,842
- 674
- 113
Does anyone prefer the first two Maiden albums, S/T and Killers, over the rest of the stuff they have done? I just find those first two albums to be very unique in sound and style, they don't sound like Maiden with Bruce at all, obviously in vocals but even with the music, it's completely different. I think those first two records to me, really do feel like a true fusion of punk and metal. Just like Motorhead, I think the first 2 Maiden albums were total fusion of punk and metal. But I guess a lot of the early new wave of british heavy metal was kind of like that.
The debut is raw and dark, and it's interesting to hear Maiden at a point where they hadn't quite found their voice, although they were close. It's a great, if slightly flawed album. Killers, imo, is better, more confident, with Maiden having at that point developed what I would consider their trademark sound.
I do. I love the energy of the first two over the polished style they eventually discover for themselves. Im also a bigger fan of Di'Anno's vocals since he sings with more ferocity than Bruce. For example, I feel like the song 2 Minutes to Midnight would sound cooler with if they sounded more like Di'Anno did on Wrathchild.
As for Priest vs Maiden, I never realized that they had a rivalry thing going on back in the day until I did a search on why these two bands always seem to get compared. Id honestly rather not choose because I have yet to catch Judas Priest on tour (seen Maiden 3 times). Though talent-wise id say Priest has Maiden edged out in every category aside from the drumming. Otherwise comparing their lyrical themes and songwriting style is like comparing apples and oranges, coming down to taste. Both bands are top tier though.