- Mar 31, 2018
- 314
- 69
- 28
- 49
In the broadest possible sense there are two "schools" of heavy metal pre-1980s (kind of like how there are two schools of jazz tenor playing, you're either a Hawkins disciple or a Lester Young disciple).Thread title: I hate grunge.
"It was just a stupid fad that kids liked back then" (in reference to a genre you dislike)
"current hipster revisionist history"
"most modern music sucks, so I fully admit to being stuck in the past when it comes to what I listen to."
To me it sounds like you are the bitter old man who cant get over the idea that music scenes have expanded and diversified. People like you who grew up only listening to the hits and stadium bands are the most boring kind of music aficionado. So when trends change you can't see past charts and music sales and get all pissed off that 'kids these days' don't enjoy the shit you grew up with. Your ignorance of mostly any music outside of glam is particularly outstanding.
It is better, especially when it prevents movements like glam that have to focus on pop hooks to remain relevant. Metal began to diversify and expand during the late 80's/early 90's, and thankfully didn't try to appeal to the mainstream. And im not even really sure if you are right, cause bands like GnR, Judas Priest, and Kiss can still sell out arenas. The fans still exist, even if some other genres of music are more "in vogue" at the moment.
Who cares? The music you liked back when you were a teen was hated by most adults of the era, so why should it be any different today? Streaming is killing the music industry far more than individual bands or music trends, but you don't even mention that once in your long stream of ramblings.
Almost all of my friends from high school have stagnated on music, and I think the trend is mostly ubiquitous. Most people cling to the nostalgia of their youth, and it seems like you arent that much different. I am younger than you, and I have friends that pretty much exclusively listen to the music from the 90s that you hate with a vengeance.
So it is unusual for the pop industry to jump on trends? lol
I think they are one of the most overrated bands of all time and are the epitome of 'trendy' music. Nobody gives a shit for anything but their debut, and their band history has as much drug and addiction problems as Nirvana, but your opinion excuses this because you like their music.
Maiden arent hair metal...
Anybody currently involved in the metal scene today would find this laughable. You are just an out of touch old timer clinging to a handful of classics while being bitter that glam metal isnt still popular today. Some of us here still even like some of the stuff you listen to, but your dismissive attitude of pretty much anything outside of what you call "hair metal" is pathetic, so fuck off.
I feel like I need to type more bullshit to be as longwinded as this pretentious out of touch glam metal faggot, but I cant find the words. Long live kurt cobain!
Theres the European school: Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, Uriah Heep, Budgie, Rainbow, Judas Priest, etc.
There's the US school: Van Halen, Aerosmith, Ted Nugent, Kiss, Alice Cooper, etc.
In the 80s the stuff generally considered to be "heavy metal" was bands influenced by the European school and the slightly later NWOBHM offshoot. This extended into newer genres like thrash, doom, power metal (the 80s definition of the term, not the modern definition of the term), etc. Thrash then later begat further offshoots like death metal.
The "hair metal" stuff was generally bands influenced by the US school...and mostly Van Halen to be honest. The US school to me has always been right on that cusp of hard rock/heavy metal, generally being more focused on upbeat party rock and stuff that "chicks dig".
The influence of Led Zeppelin kind of falls somewhere in between the two schools as Plant's stage presence was a popular influential thing for hair metal vocalists to emulate...if you could mix Plant and Steven Tyler together you basically have every frontman for every commercial metal act during the entire decade.
This is of course an over-simplification, but I think it works from a cursory standpoint. If you read interviews with Motley Crue or Ratt during the 80s they always listed bands like Kiss and Aerosmith as primary influences. If you read interviews with bands like Metallica or Slayer they usually mentioned Sabbath, Deep Purple and all the NWOBHM bands. Anybody who thinks hair metal bands didn't care about the music is just ignorant. They cared no more or less than musicians in any other rock genre. Not saying it was all gold, but the implication that because of their appearance they didn't care about the songs is just asinine. Any thought that musicians in thrash or speed metal or just rock bands didn't care about the way they looked is also completely misguided. FWIW, as someone who grew up as a metal kid in the 80s/early 90s the genres weren't nearly as defined as they are now. We'd listen to Metallica or Iron Maiden or Megadeth and then something on the poppier end of the scale - Crue, Warrant, Slaughter, Cinderella, whatever. Yeah some people weren't into the extremes on either end (Firehouse or King Diamond, for example), but for the most part metal was metal and it was all rock.