CiG
Harbinger of Metal
There are similar teachers here too. No I don't seek out American examples, it comes with the territory of things that interest me.
Somehow we're all a part of it. Somehow you're a part of it.
These motherfuckers are a part of it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...g-black-disabled-teammate-with-a-coat-hanger/
The teachers interviewed in that article, and most university professors, are far less involved in radical action than you both think.
Teachers have political leanings, but overwhelmingly they do not bring them into the classroom; and when they do, they often do so in a mild manner. They don't deliver diatribes or inflammatory speeches.
I'm not speaking for all teachers, of course. I'm speaking for the vast majority. Teachers care about politics, sure, but not in the classroom. In the classroom, they care about teaching their damn students who would rather be out protesting instead of sitting in class and learning.
I’m going home, back to the ’hood of Chicago, to be exactly who I was before I came to Oberlin.”
I guess "a part" is pretty vague, eh?
As far as "white on black crime", sure it's a terrible thing (all crime is), but it's statistically and nominally rare. Since the DOJ quit publishing race stats (maybe because it doesn't support the narrative?), I had to find a "special tabulation". Looks like BLM needs to march on the ghettos. Maybe that's what that one student meant when she said she was going back to the ghetto (but I doubt it).
Not radical action in the terms of burning and looting. Inculcating the premises for doing so in a mild manner.
It doesn't support the "narrative" if you assume that all individual crimes committed are equal (i.e. that a black person mugging a white person is the same as a white person sticking a coat hanger up a disabled black person's rectum).
Those aren't equal though, and they signify different things. You want to say that all crime signifies the same thing - moral depravity, immaturity, entitlement culture, etc. etc. I don't agree with you that you can draw that equation.
I'm not saying that the actions of social activists today are warranted... but it's wrong to cultivate an environment that suggests those actions could be necessary at some point?
"I feel like we established ourselves as funny a long time ago," she said. "Women in comedy are having to re-prove ourselves over and over again. To a certain extent every comedian has to win over an audience, but if I was a mediocre white male comic, I could probably slide by a lot more."
Sure we could find some way to rank crimes in terms of horrificness, and obviously a mugging wouldn't rank as highly as rectally violating a disabled person, but nor would it rate as highly as the Newsom murders. That event is, of course, a "dog whistle" for white supremacists - but that "begs the question" why do the previously linked stories, or the Eric Garner event, get the focus? It can't simply be the old truism that it's rare events that sell. Or could it?
I grew up steeped in an environment concerned with UN hegemon, tanks in the streets (of course if you look at large PD forces now, this isn't far off), etc etc and I wound up joining the military and going into higher ed. These kids get poor fundamental education in K-12, take a couple classes of oppression ideology, and suddenly they are sacrificing their health and sanity protesting the apparatus that lets them drink fancy drinks while being counterproductive members of society. Burning and looting and shutting down traffic in multiple cities (speaking more broadly here, not specifically about Oberlin) is a far cry from squatting on a remote wildlife refuge, or playing army in the woods. Returning to that one quote about returning to the hood: I think that's essentially what the protesting looks like.
It wouldn't be a ranking, merely a way to distinguish between what different events signify. A mugging signifies something different than forcing a black person to recite KKK chants before sexually assaulting him.
We can draw a correlation between economic conditions and black crime without justifying criminal action. All I'm suggesting is that black crime and the crime I cited reflect very different social circumstances. I'm not trying to "rank" one as worse than the other.
"These kids"...
You know that the number of students enrolled in higher education, even the number of students enrolled as Humanities majors, vastly outnumbers the number of "kids" out stomping in the streets?
I'm not saying it isn't a problem, but it looks to me like Humanities instructors are producing far fewer protesters than they are non-protesters.
The fucking outrage. Kid's mother is fucked. Until next week, when everyone forgets the whole thing, that is.I love this gorilla incident thing exploding on the socialinterwebs. Western Civ is pretty much doomed from what I can gather reading the comments.