The point it makes is that leftist apologists for Antifa don't understand the criticisms against Antifa. That's it.
This isn't fair, and it's way too apologetic toward rightist memes.
The cartoon that Dak posted depicted an antifa person as a large, bulky, intimidating looking individual. That's a popular image, and it's from a right-wing cartoonist (or at least someone who's committed to representing the right-wing side). It's reflecting a popular image of the left that's coming from the right.
Maybe you don't share this impression, and maybe you're capable of critically separating accusations of violence from a particular image of what violent people look like. But the cartoon is evidence to the contrary (in Dak's words, the physiques should be switched, or whatever); it perpetuates a particular image of leftists that conflicts with simultaneous criticisms of them as fragile snowflakes.
Now, you can maintain that there is no real contradiction, and that accusations of violent behavior don't reflect a specific image; but if you do, then you also have to admit that the cartoon Dak posted is propagating the same misconception as the meme I posted.
Which is exactly what memes and cartoons do. They don't offer insightful, nuanced criticisms of political discrepancies, and to think they do is to either a) grant way too much intellectual merit to these images, or b) betray your political biases (or both, of course). The meme I posted isn't less insightful than any rightist memes. Fuck the whole "the left can't meme" bullshit--no one can meme, if by meme we're talking about detailed critical analysis. Memes are shortcuts to provocative talking points, that's all.
