I was quite young when I saw Forrest Gump. I didn’t know who Gary Sinise was then (sorry, Gary) and for the first time IN MY LIFE, I saw another human being whose body looked like mine, a double above-the-knee amputee (don’t get me started on the fact that he was a man — lack of female perspective is a separate letter altogether). Then I found out that Gary was able-bodied, wearing long green socks on his lower legs, and they erased them out of the film. And in that instant, I felt erased too.
Individuals with disabilities make up almost 20% of the world’s population. We are the largest minority and the “most marginalized group in Hollywood,” according to a 2017 study conducted by Fox, CBS and the Ruderman Family Foundation (an organization I know you are aware of and engaging with now). The study found that in last year’s TV season, less than 2% of characters were written to have a disability and of THOSE characters, 95% of the roles were filled with able-bodied actors.
Pretty sure that 20% figure includes mental illness and that there's no shortage of that in Hollywood. Not sure how being a depressed pedophile qualifies one to play a below-the-knee amputee though.
These scales, in short, are all too often structured in a way in which respondents’ tendencies toward dogmatism or close-mindedness or intolerance are ascertained by asking them about issues that are politicized. And while social and political psychologists have sometimes asked about rigidity in ways designed to tap liberal ideas — the famed authoritarianism researcher Bob Altemeyer, for example, did publish a left-wing authoritarianism scale — this has been the exception rather than the norm.
Why this asymmetry? The Malka team carefully states early in its chapter that “[W]e make no claim that ideological bias plays a role” in any of the rigidity of the right model’s shortcomings, and that they “leave that as a matter for other scholars to debate.” But one obvious possibility that other social psychologists have raised, in both this context and others, is that certain weaknesses in the field flow from how ideologically slanted it is: Within social psychology, there is something like a 14-to-1 ratio in favor of liberal-identifying researchers relative to conservative-identifying ones. Even if you’re not broadly sympathetic to the idea that liberal bias in academia is a major problem — and I certainly view that claim as overstated — 14-to-1 is, well, a big gap. That’s how blind spots creep in — that’s how you keeping gauging study subjects’ “sensitivity to threat” by asking them about crime or terrorism, but rarely about climate change or right-wing police violence, and then “discover” that conservatives are more sensitive to threat. “This sort of ‘soft bias’ can be really hard to spot if most or all researchers have the same ideological outlook because it is built into people’s ideologically guided beliefs about reality,” said Yoel Inbar, a psychology researcher at the University of Toronto and a co-author of a key paper that revealed the ideological tilt within social and personality psychology. “Worrying about the threats your side cares about seems entirely well-founded and reasonable, worrying about those the other side cares about demands an explanation.”
https://www.recode.net/2018/7/18/17588116/mark-zuckerberg-clarifies-holocaust-denial-offensiveMZ: I’m Jewish, and there’s a set of people who deny that the Holocaust happened.
Interviewer: Yes, there’s a lot.
MZ: I find that deeply offensive. But at the end of the day, I don’t believe that our platform should take that down because I think there are things that different people get wrong. I don’t think that they’re intentionally getting it wrong, but I think-
Interviewer: In the case of the Holocaust deniers, they might be, but go ahead.
MZ: It’s hard to impugn intent and to understand the intent. I just think, as abhorrent as some of those examples are, I think the reality is also that I get things wrong when I speak publicly. I’m sure you do. I’m sure a lot of leaders and public figures we respect do too, and I just don’t think that it is the right thing to say, “We’re going to take someone off the platform if they get things wrong, even multiple times.” What we will do is we’ll say, “Okay, you have your page, and if you’re not trying to organize harm against someone, or attacking someone, then you can put up that content on your page, even if people might disagree with it or find it offensive.” But that doesn’t mean that we have a responsibility to make it widely distributed in News Feed. I think we, actually, to the contrary-
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/mb4e7n/how-to-treat-fat-people-ally-fatphobia
Can't wait for the day of the gastric band.
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/mb4e7n/how-to-treat-fat-people-ally-fatphobia
Can't wait for the day of the gastric band.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...noah-france-french-ambassador-araud-world-cup
Trevor Noah believes genetics = nationality. uH OoOoh. Actually, he's not nuanced enough for that. Africa is not a homogeneous suite.
tbf there probably is a small percentage of people that are fat and healthy, in as much as "healthy" is defined along terms of longevity and not the ability to run a mile in a certain amount of time. I watched a shitton of Hogan's Heroes as a kid with my brothers, and it blew our mind that Leon Askin/General Burkhalter almost hit 100 and outlived almost all of the rest of the cast, despite being quite fat for at least the last 50 years of his life. Some people pack it away only in their bellies instead of their arteries I guess. Of course, Sgt Schulz died in his early 60s.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...noah-france-french-ambassador-araud-world-cup
Trevor Noah believes genetics = nationality. uH OoOoh. Actually, he's not nuanced enough for that. Africa is not a homogeneous suite.
https://www.newsweek.com/shell-gas-...nty-sheriffs-office-natural-ice-1032333?amp=1
Tired of the "didn't deserve to do over X". Play stupid games win stupid prizes. Loled a bit that the strongest praise was "he was a half-decent guy". A half decent felon who steals beer supposedly on his way to work after probably hitting his gf.
However, there is a deeper problem with trigger warnings. According to the most-basic tenets of psychology, the very idea of helping people with anxiety disorders avoid the things they fear is misguided. A person who is trapped in an elevator during a power outage may panic and think she is going to die… If you want this woman to retain her fear for life, you should help her avoid elevators.
...........
Students who call for trigger warnings may be correct that some of their peers are harboring memories of trauma that could be reactivated by course readings. But they are wrong to try to prevent such reactivations. Students with PTSD should of course get treatment, but they should not try to avoid normal life, with its many opportunities for habituation… And they’d better get their habituation done in college, because the world beyond college will be far less willing to accommodate requests for trigger warnings and opt-outs.