i didn't read far enough to get to the funny parthttps://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/01/neanderthal-spears-threw-pretty-well/581218/
Wonder why academics thought thought they didn't have that range? Maybe the pencilarmed were the ones trying to throw them?
Qualifications like being an "edgy 90's comedian" for example.
I'll admit at the outset that I didn't know exactly what the NPC meme or its predecessors and variants stood for, but it was pretty obvious to me from the first time I saw it posted here that it was a comforting symbol of solidarity among the lonely incel, true-cuck internet community intent on lashing out against the mainstream and establishment to instill in themselves a sense of belonging in the world and to fill the hole that the lack of social lives and sexlessness has bore into their souls. That said, I hardly see how Bill Maher fits this narrative.
Qualifications like being an "edgy 90's comedian" for example.
Or, more broadly, being of Jewish ethnicity
I'll give you a response to your actual point when I'm on a computer. You make one, but it's a false equivalency.
Qualifications like being an "edgy 90's comedian" for example.
If you say so. But how hilariously cocky is it for Bill Maher to advertise himself as "the whole truth and nothing but" when he's only a political pundit because he was given a show called Politically Incorrect in the 90's and just... kept at it.
Jews make up 1% of the population but are the majority of those involved in the comedy industry, a massive industry monopolized by a handful of media corporations controlled by a small number of (largely Jewish) executives. Why are you upset about women, 50% of the population, making up some modest percentage of the right-wing YouTube commentator cottage industry?
Two things:
NPC meme.... was a comforting symbol of solidarity among the lonely incel, true-cuck internet community intent on lashing out against the mainstream and establishment to instill in themselves a sense of belonging in the world and to fill the hole that the lack of social lives and sexlessness has bore into their souls.
nobody cunts like her and Tomi Lahren somehow become somebodies purely out of the fact that they 1) have cunts 2) are at least 6s out of 10s on the neck-beard ranking system 3) and parrot fringe talking points. At least give me some qualifications or deeds of merit.
Yeah yeah, Jews and Hollywood and intellectuals and Nobel Prizes, etc. I don't want to get into a protracted discussion on this and reaffirm the delusion floating around here that I'm Jewish; further, you're trying to be cute with this and bait me into something with assumptions of fairness you yourself don't support and with assertions that are either misleading, vague, or false (modest percentage--sorry but not close), so there's no real motivation here for me to engage in a sincere discussion on this at this moment.
Styxhexenhammer666420blazeit
the "Change my mind" guy
Some men have great TV faces too, of course.
I do have one earnest question for you: have you ever actually watched an episode of Real Time? There's quite a lot of designations you could throw at Maher, but a conduit of typical contemporary progressive ideology isn't one of them.
I would argue that does rank higher in qualifications than a pussy and a MAGA hat.
His "edginess" was directly related to political issues, and it's more than fair to say that Maher's got significantly more balanced and nuanced views on politics than this new breed of viral video conservatives, whether they be women or men.
Hell, the intellectual of the group is Shapiro, but I'd rank the depth of his debating and take-down skills to be much deeper than his intellectual depth.
And regardless of his personal views, his show is hardly a vassal for opinions he agreed with.
I've watched his show for a while and I fucking hated 80% of his views for years, but I watched it anyways because 1) it's a comedy show and I'm entertained by those aspects of it and 2) it's one of the few places where you can actually see libertarians and democratic socialists engage each other in a (mostly) intellectually honest format.