Dak
mentat
Tulsi right on FP, but not in a nuanced way, and her domestic policy is just a mirror of all the other clowns. Yang just needs to secure the (nomination) bag and select her as VP for a semisane FP voice.
i was writing the way American people speak*More dumb.
I take it you feel that this description of women's liberation is far from caricature. If that's the case, do you actually believe it's a widespread cultural problem? i.e. that women's liberation will lead to the sterility of humankind? I'm asking because I apparently live in the hotbed of women's liberation, yet most of my female friends have married men and plan to have children. It's neither my experience nor my intellectual opinion that women's liberation means liberation from biology; so I'm curious what value you perceive in a comment like this.
It's neither my experience nor my intellectual opinion that women's liberation means liberation from biology
Anecdotes are sometimes valid references. Not in the case of TFR. TFR in the West is almost entirely if not entirely subreplacement. While 3rd world TFR is still high and the population exploding, global TFR is projected to drop below replacement by the end of the century. I believe this to be wishful thinking, while I do think the total population will start to drop due to 3rd world populations being unable to maintain necessary resource extraction/production/logistic systems necessary to support ongoing population growth. Current systems and technologies are too complex for ~90% of the population to comprehend, much less manage, and that goes to 99.99+% of the 3rd world population.
But a decrease in fertility rates doesn't translate into species sterility, right?
I don't understand why someone couldn't argue that the planet is overpopulated, and that a decreasing population in fact increases the odds of long-term species survival.