rms
Active Member
Wasted too much time responding to the ridiculousness of basement dwellers calling migrants Invaders
I mean, I knew this is where we'd eventually end up; but the point is that invaders don't show up crying at the door begging to be let in--or even sneak in, accept work from eager American businesses (whose owners aren't ignorant to what's going on), and quietly go about their lives.
So I say again, no invasion. My point was about your word choice, not whether there are people coming to the southern border. There certainly are, a lot of them; and something needs to be done other than simply letting everyone in without a process or institution in place. Calling it an invasion is less a semantically accurate statement than a rhetorically charged statement. It achieves its linguistic force through its connotative suggestions, not through what it denotes.
spoken like the true clueless idiot you are.crying at the door begging to be let in--or even sneak in, accept work from eager American businesses (whose owners aren't ignorant to what's going on), and quietly go about their lives.
spoken like the true clueless idiot you are.
... oh look, the scorned twat who cant stop mentioning me just because i've continually handed him his own ass for the last few weeks. Lulz, you must really like the taste of my balls!
"work"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income
Even looking at nationalities broadly, those of shithole countries are generally the poorest and least capable among all groups, and that ignores that illegal workers frequently do not have their wages reported. The work they produce is frequently useless and a net drain on the economy after factoring in the copious public goods they leech.
but i never said i'm gonna stop heckling your "bitch ass". I've actually said the opposite numerous times ....
Is poverty grounds for asylum?They come seeking asylum. That's not a hostile takeover, it's a cry for help--and it's a far cry from "barbarians at the gates."
but i never said i'm gonna stop heckling your "bitch ass". I've actually said the opposite numerous times ....
Is poverty grounds for asylum?
You said letting everyone in is not the answer... so who would you reject?
Of course you wouldn’t open the gates to all, you’re smart. Well since that system doesn’t exist right now, we gotta have criteria for who gets in and who doesn’t, right? At least in the meantime, while we improve our infrastructure. So what’ll be your criteria? Surely not just being poor?
I said that opening the gates to all without any extensive infrastructure in place for acclimation and naturalization isn't the answer. The system we currently have isn't equipped to handle the global refugee crisis. There needs to be a coordinated international effort to intercept and redistribute those displaced by regional violence and resource loss.
Ideally, no one gets rejected.
So you’d reject poor adult males and accept poor women and children, ok you have a threshold, an easy one to reach, but at least you have one. Would you consider level of poverty, or just anyone who looks kinda poor even if they have smartphones?I don't think I have the authority to come up with criteria. Speaking as a non-expert on the issue, this is what I'd say:
Poverty/precarity should be a criteria for entry. Of course, most of the people fleeing Central American countries are already deeply impoverished, so that's not something that really needs to be identified. If I'm being forced into the decision of making a choice, then I'd say priority should be given to families with minors and women traveling alone.
The “copious public goods they leech” is an unknown number, but best estimates suggest it’s a negligible value at most. Research shows that legal immigrants tend to improve the wages of high school-educated Americans, and in fact use fewer welfare resources than low-income natives. It’s very likely that legal immigrant production offsets any drain that illegal immigrants might pose—and it’s possible they pose none.
The second claimant, known only as Mum A, is the mother of a 15-year-old girl with autism, who is awaiting treatment at the clinic.
Keira describes being a tomboy as a child. When asked how strongly she felt the need to change her gender identity, she replied that it gradually built up as she found out more about transitioning online.
Then as she went down the medical route, she said "one step led to another".