HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,723
- 113
I initially was going to reply simply "Beautiful." assuming that they were being punished by the left for giving an inch, but seeing that it came from one of Trump's feds is even better.
I wouldn’t call it incredible. I have uncles who could do the same
I think you're selling yourself and a lot of people our age short, not to mention some of our drunk uncles.
Trump doesn't drink, which I'm sure contributes to his ability to sustain himself onstage. But somehow I don't think he stresses too much about the presidency.
You are right that he successfully captivates his fans for two plus hours. So do modern pop stars. It just goes to show he's an entertainer, nothing else.
After subjecting more than 10,000 people to knowledge-based questions about the state of the world, the late researcher Hans Rosling found that, on average, activists had a less accurate picture than the general public of the very issue to which their activism is devoted.
https://quillette.com/2020/09/17/black-lives-matter-and-the-mechanics-of-conformity/
Activists are ignorant. Marches are ignorance in action. That's the charitable view. The uncharitable view is that activists are malignant and purposeful destroyers.
Just activists/-ism of a particular historical moment, I'm assuming...? Or would you say that the marches in Selma, suffragist picketing, and the Boston Tea Party were also ignorance in action...?
Maybe to a lesser degree than today in terms of the complaints, but yes.
The protests that took place in 140 U.S. cities this spring were mostly peaceful, but the arson, vandalism and looting that did occur will result in at least $1 billion to $2 billion of paid insurance claims — eclipsing the record set in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the police officers who brutalized Rodney King.
Does this mean we agree that the Founding Fathers were basically whiny children...?![]()
I'll just point out that the large majority of activist movements currently taking place in this country are nonviolent and non-destructive. A plethora of YouTube videos doesn't change that.
It's a good thing the majority are "nonviolent and non-destructive" when you consider the severity of violence and destruction the small portion is already responsible for.
As CIG noted, we probably couldn't recover if they were/the military probably would be called up anyway if they were.
The main reason majority of the protests have been peaceful is because there have been protests in every state, many of which are 100 people or less, and in small towns and cornball states like Alaska which had protests in 12 different parts with 0 incidents. In Hawaii there were like 10 protests held, none of them breaking 500 people, and none of those protests were violent. Examples like these count towards the overall peacefulness of the protests.
What do the numbers look like when you limit it to protests with sizeable crowds or in large towns and cities? You can claim "peaceful majority" all day long, but the public perception of the protests has been pretty badly damaged.