If Mort Divine ruled the world

[Blurry_Dreams]

https://twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1148197824791814144?s=20

Wokism, as I've said before, is like Fundy Christianity. Apparently others notice too.

i disagree with number 5

 

[Blurry_Dreams]

https://nypost.com/2019/06/29/suny-...tled-seeing-poor-white-people-makes-me-happy/

from the article

“He remains a member of our faculty. Dr. Powers has been advised that he does not speak, nor should he suggest at any time, that he is speaking for the college.”

In a June 2016 piece on another site, The Independent, Powers blasts people who voted for President Trump as “racist a- -holes.”

“F- -k your whiteness with my dirty Rick James boots,” he wrote in the piece.

In a 2018 piece, Powers admits popping ecstasy and roaming the East Village in a drug-induced stupor to celebrate the election of Barack Obama in 2008.

hilarious

 

[HamburgerBoy]

@HamburgerBoy
anyone besides me still thinking Kavanaugh should be in prison??

For helping to author the Patriot Act, yes.

 

[The Ozzman]

 

[Dak]

https://twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1149386568861401088

To say the emergent ideology views gender as performance isn't enough- gender is*always*performative, even if it is based on a deep foundation of biology and culture. The emergent ideology wants gender to be *unconvincing* performance, to engender alienation between body and mind

 

[Blurry_Dreams]

For helping to author the Patriot Act, yes.

if all the people who helped author the patriot act went to prison that would be awesome

but i was also referring to how it's pretty obvious that he's a sexual predator

 

[CiG]

but i was also referring to how it's pretty obvious that he's a sexual predator

Based on what?

 

[Dak]

https://twitter.com/PsychoSchmitt/status/1150077041011806208

"Trigger warnings may have been developed under incredibly well-meaning pretenses, but they have now failed to prove useful in study after study...probably useless for most people and potentially, though not definitively, a little harmful to some"

I continue to be vindicated by ¡Science!

 

[Mort Divine]

 

[Dak]

https://www.salon.com/2019/07/12/th...rump-could-rig-elections-for-decades_partner/

The charade and innuendos are almost entirely gone at this point. Open admission (not the only article like this either) that Democrats are the party of criminals and noncitizens and how dare non-criminal citizens object to being robbed blind by "rigging" elections. Because importing noncitizens and letting them vote isn't "rigging." Cherry on top is pointing out that the blessing of diversity is an increase in crime.

 

[EternalMetal]

They make it sound like doomsday just because delegates don't reflect the number of voters. This honestly sounds like more accurate representation. Why should non-voters count at all? Am I missing something?

 

[CiG]

Love it when Dems pretend to care about "voting rights" while at the same time when the DNC was confronted about rigging its own primaries to the detriment of its own voters their defence was "we're a corporation, we don't owe anybody a fair go, we can also change our rules whenever we like."

Also; why would checking citizenship status intimidate millions of non-whites into not voting?

 

[Dak]

Also; why would checking citizenship status intimidate millions of non-whites into not voting?

Considering the conservative (under)estimate is 10+ million illegals, the idea is that it contributes to an "atmosphere" that might give millions of illegals the idea they shouldn't break the law. Since their every waking breath and step is breaking the law and many if not most are <85 IQ, I doubt they put that much thought or care into it.

 

[Dak]

Non-native who hates natives is more native than natives because she hates how natives do things and wants more non-natives to out-number natives.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Looks like Trump has officially started campaigning for reelection 2015-style with that recent rayciss tweet controversy thing.

 

[viewerfromnihil]

https://www.salon.com/2019/07/12/th...rump-could-rig-elections-for-decades_partner/

The charade and innuendos are almost entirely gone at this point. Open admission (not the only article like this either) that Democrats are the party of criminals and noncitizens and how dare non-criminal citizens object to being robbed blind by "rigging" elections. Because importing noncitizens and letting them vote isn't "rigging." Cherry on top is pointing out that the blessing of diversity is an increase in crime.

Yes, because this totally isn't a complete mischaracterization.

They make it sound like doomsday just because delegates don't reflect the number of voters. This honestly sounds like more accurate representation. Why should non-voters count at all? Am I missing something?

Non-citizens (non-voters) have always counted because it says so in the Constitution. Here's the original in Article 1, section three:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

All free persons, even those in indentured servitude, were counted. Even slaves counted, albeit as 3/5s of a person. Indians were the exception to this. Of course, the first sentence in Article 1, Section 3 was replace by Section 2 of the 14th Amendment with the abolition. It reads:

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

First sentence is pretty straight forward. Representatives are apportioned based on number of inhabitants, regardless of citizenship--this was also during a period of mass migration to the US, so it's not as if they weren't aware that non-citizens would be counted. The second sentence is nice legalese, saying to the former slave holding states, 'If you deny former slaves the right to vote, we'll restrict your apportionment to white males.'

Love it when Dems pretend to care about "voting rights" while at the same time when the DNC was confronted about rigging its own primaries to the detriment of its own voters their defence was "we're a corporation, we don't owe anybody a fair go, we can also change our rules whenever we like."

Also; why would checking citizenship status intimidate millions of non-whites into not voting?

It's not about intimidating non-voters into not voting. It's about intimidating non-citizens into not filling out census forms. The number of representatives and electoral college votes the 50 states receive is based on census data. There's only 435 seats in the House and 535 votes for the electoral college, and every census reapportions which state gets what. Adding the question could intimidate some of the 13 million legal resident non-citizens from filling out the forms. Of course, it will certainly discourage illegal immigrants from participating, but that's not exactly a new problem. There are lots of stories from 2010 about illegal immigrants being afraid of filling out the forms.

 

[CiG]

I said non-white, regarding this section from the article:

It was a huge victory for voting rights, as Trump and his allies have sought to use the inclusion of such a question to intimidate minorities out of responding to the census at all, undercounting millions of people in disproportionately nonwhite, Democratic parts of the country and denying them funding and representation.

Reads as if they're shoehorning race into the subject to me.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Indians not taxed aren't represented, but Maria and her 17 children all on government benefits are. Clearly there are no perverted incentives at hand behind the current wave of mass migration, and our current system of government is functioning as intended.

 

[The Ozzman]

Brunning and stave

One of my favorite movie franchises ruined

https://nypost.com/2019/07/14/lashana-lynch-cast-as-007-in-new-james-bond-movie-report/

 

[CiG]

Brunning and stave

One of my favorite movie franchises ruined

https://nypost.com/2019/07/14/lashana-lynch-cast-as-007-in-new-james-bond-movie-report/

From article:

"Bond himself will still be played by Daniel Craig — and will still adhere to his old-fashioned macho characteristics, an insider told the UK paper.

‘Bond, of course, is sexually attracted to the new female 007 and tries his usual seduction tricks, but is baffled when they don’t work on a brilliant, young black woman who basically rolls her eyes at him and has no interest in jumping into his bed,” a source told the Mail."

“There are spectacular chase sequences and fights, and Bond is still Bond but he’s having to learn to deal with the world of #MeToo.”