Dak
mentat
Trump passed a MoCA a couple of years ago to answer questions about his mental status. Biden needs to take one.
i think its amazing that this would even need to be stated. Shows just how scummy a lot of people in this country can be.Personally I wouldn't vote for anybody I believed was a rapist.
You're such a spineless pos.wadayagonnado?
Jefferson was most likely a rapist and he was the best president we've ever had.
You don't know someone will be a great president until well after they've served so that's kind of a moot point.
Missing the point quite epicly. I'm not talking about whether rape precludes one from being a great anything, I'm saying I personally wouldn't vote for someone I believed was a rapist.
Sure, I'm not saying you are obligated to, I'm just saying that being a rapist isn't negatively correlated with presidential performance, so if both candidates are rapists but one of them is preferable for other reasons, then "wadayagonnado?" holds up.
I believe that CIG is making an appeal to normative moral standards rather than an "all things being equal" assessment of presidentiality.
In this case, one of the accused assaulters is already in office; so voting for Biden is virtually the same thing as voting Trump out. I don't think there's a morally sound choice, but that doesn't mean it's rational to abstain from making one.
dat critical thinking doeso voting for Biden is virtually the same thing as voting Trump out. I don't think there's a morally sound choice, but that doesn't mean it's rational to abstain from making one.
it means you're a spinless fuck who cant put aside his political bias and cares more about the political leaning of a candidate than anything else. Im just glad that you're approaching this in a such a shameless attitude, now maybe others can see what kind f person you really are.but that doesn't mean it's rational to abstain from making one.
if they were actual rapists the law would step in and at the very least they wouldn't be running
Talking about belief here. I don't believe Biden or Trump raped someone (doesn't mean I don't think it's possible) and if they were actual rapists the law would step in and at the very least they wouldn't be running. What you're talking about is whether being accused of a sex crime is negatively correlated with performance.
The context is that the left broadly speaking holds to a #believe ideology and so wanting to vote for someone they believe is a rapist because they believe the other guy is a rapist exposes a hypocrisy in their worldview.
Setting aside the morality of the choice (yes I'd abstain if deciding solely on moral grounds) I think it's rational not to vote in a warmonger with the blood of hundreds of thousands of lives on his hands (not to mention the trillions of dollars wasted in Iraq). If they're both rapists, all things are still not equal.
Setting aside the morality of the choice (yes I'd abstain if deciding solely on moral grounds) I think it's rational not to vote in a warmonger with the blood of hundreds of thousands of lives on his hands (not to mention the trillions of dollars wasted in Iraq). If they're both rapists, all things are still not equal.
you think they''re both rapists then voting in Biden is still you basically voting in a rapist
it means you're a spinless fuck who cant put aside his political bias and cares more about the political leaning of a candidate than anything else. Im just glad that you're approaching this in a such a shameless attitude, now maybe others can see what kind f person you really are.
Sure, but warmongering and foreign spending are other issues, which I'm saying a hypothetical voter would take into consideration. It sounds to me like you're conceding the point.
Rape and other sex crimes are only brought up to prevent other political actions from taking place. That #BelieveHer is a thing doesn't inherently imply that voting against rapists is a #1 priority. There are countless rapes every day and the few more that might take place by a rapist president do not necessarily offset the potential rapes that result from his non-rapist opponent's policies. For example, war is universally associated with rape. Every president that has sent troops into a war zone has facilitated mass rape on a scale that a Bill Clinton could not achieve even with a free one-year-pass to Epstein Island and lifetime supply of Viagra. Every governor that refuses to allow women to ccw on streets or that refuses to pass one-party-consent recording laws is enabling mass rape, while creating an image of a strong police state. Arguably, even bans on prostitution result in an increase in rape (e.g. Rhode Island's rape rate went down during a loophole period where prostitution was legal for a few years).
You forgot to quote the IF in my statement, you spinless faggot.I never said I thought he was though. I knew your blind rage would get in the way of your reading comprehension eventually (not that it's very good to begin with).
oh yes, says the guy who literally just said hes cool with voting for someone who he thinks might be a rapist just because he aint trumpI'm pretty sure you're the only one who cares this much.