Sister Of Destruction
#teamjesterslave
- Jul 20, 2018
- 373
- 179
- 43
- 29
,, I am the Hungarian " XD
Oh no Bjorn copy his own riffs, holly Jesper come back to in flames
Oh no Bjorn copy his own riffs, holly Jesper come back to in flames
Battles is more metal than SOAPF and Battles is pretty shit in that department as well.
That's wrong on so many levels...SOAPF is more mature and more richer album experience for sure, but saying it's more metal than ASOP is borderline trolling. The dudes who wrote ASOP and the stuff before that would've been through two songs already, while the wise, old fella meticulously put together a seemingly hour long riff.
,, I am the Hungarian " XD
Oh no Bjorn copy his own riffs, holly Jesper come back to in flames
No way in hell SOAPF, SC, and Battles sound the same.
But also no way in hell ITM is exactly the same as Battles. Listen to the two back to back, ITM has many more metal elements. That’s in addition to the better production.
The guitar playing is the exact same shit through different productions.No way in hell SOAPF, SC, and Battles sound the same.
So what?The guitar playing is the exact same shit through different productions.
Pre-SOAPF it was much better. You know, it was actually fun. pre-R2R was more melodic, and post R2R was more agressive. SOAPF managed to lose all the aggressiveness, and only retain an itsy-bitsy more melodic sound. Terrible trade all around.So what?
How can it be the same guitar shit? They ripped off all their older albums to make this album, except for the choruses. Yes, choruses are the same as Battles. Verses are rip offs of old shit though, and some SOAPF. But mostly ASOP.The guitar playing is the exact same shit through different productions.
I don't know what you expect, they want to earn more money so that's normal thing that they leave aggression behind. If you think that in flames come back to their old times you are probably drunkPre-SOAPF it was much better. You know, it was actually fun. pre-R2R was more melodic, and post R2R was more agressive. SOAPF managed to lose all the aggressiveness, and only retain an itsy-bitsy more melodic sound. Terrible trade all around.
Just check out how ASOP blasts into your face (a familiar feeling I assume), and doesn't stop. Previous records are no different really, culminating in CC, where every single guitar sound rips your ears off.
You can rip something off and it in the shitty guitars of SC. You can also rip something off basically play it almost entirely with the same settings (just different production, but leave that out of the picture now) like on ITM. It's like, a Scottish pipe band can cover Metallica too, but it won't be metal. Same thing with IF.How can it be the same guitar shit? They ripped off all their older albums to make this album, except for the choruses. Yes, choruses are the same as Battles. Verses are rip offs of old shit though, and some SOAPF. But mostly ASOP.
Am I? IAA, Burn and ITM are many steps towards that. I am not expecting anything similar to the R2R/STYE/CC trio, I just want their metal sound back. And signs are on the wall that it may be happening with this record.I don't know what you expect, they want to earn more money so that's normal thing that they leave aggression behind. If you think that in flames come back to their old times you are probably drunk
Yeah but KoЯn play totally different genre of metal, not even melodic so it was easy to bulid their fame especially in USA and they are not very aggressive, they are posers like slipknotThey don’t need to lose aggression to make money. IF worships Korn right? Did Korn get popular by going soft? No. They might need pop elements, but not lose aggression.