Metalhead28 said:
I use ProEngineer software for 3D design and it is not available for a Mac. Simple as that. Hence....I am a PC dude.
Sketchup does the same exact thing, but easier, and is available for PC and Mac. Have a nice day.
EtherForBreakfast said:
I think if you grew up with Mac's, you will use them. Vice versa for PC.
Not true. I grew up
building custom PC's for my dad's little business he had on the side, which he did a TON of. From the ages of 10 to 16 I built and setup some monster PC's (for their time) and all I had ever heard about Macs was from my dad, and all he had to say was "there is no software for them, and they are lightyears behind PC's and the Windows operating system." I hadn't touched a Mac, or even seen one in person until I started working at the studio at age 17. All it took was 10 minutes with it and I was sold from then on.
EtherForBreakfast said:
I guess the main reason I do not own a mac is because you cannot build your own from scratch using any combination of hardware from any manufacturer to build a totally custom rig and being able to addon/upgrade/change/modify at will with absolute ease and relatively inexpensively.
My boss says the same thing. Who cares? A Mac just works. It performs just as well/better than your custom built PC out of the box. Who cares what's in it? Why question the inconsequential? If it ain't broke, don't fucking fix it, as they say. It's been proven time and time again with
countless studies from reputable research groups. Macs outperform PC's. It's just been proven. There's no possible argument to that. Why does it matter that you can build it yourself? Why? So
you can put together various third-party parts instead of a company? So that
you are the one assembling a bunch of parts that are not designed to access the full potential of each peice it works with? Yeah, you got a point, I'd rather be the one causing the bottle-necking in my system, not some greedy company like Dell or anything. Who needs every part in that case to be designed alongside each other in the same place? Why would you want everything to work perfectly with no bottlenecks in the data flow? Stupid me.
I really don't want to...but I'm gonna bust it out anyway. Microsoft used Apple computers to develop, in it's entirety, their flagship, ground-breaking, multi-award winning game, Halo. Now...if PC's are sooooo great, and Windows is sooooo much better, why didn't Microsoft, a company that has more money than the United States Government (no, I'm kidding), use Macs instead of custom built PC's running Windows, to develop this game with? HMMMM???? A company that can afford to build a batch of super-rediculous maxed out, overclocked, balls to the wall, off-the-charts PC's for it's programming team, bought a handful of Macs instead. Gosh, it just boggles my mind why they would do that.
I'm not trying to say that Macs are rediculously better than PC's. But rather, you can't deny (after the countless tests and research studies proving it) their performance and reliability increase over Windows based PC's. I'm so sick of hearing about this crap I could scream. It's all been proven. I fucking hate PC's. I love Macs. It's a preference. But I don't go around talking about every time I got on a Windows 3.0 system and it crashed. Who cares? Fuck a IIc in it's ass and move on with your day. How about talking shit about the new G5's, MacBook's, and Mac Mini's that are utilizing the new Intel Conroe chips to
further whip the absolute
shit out of PC's yet
again, huh? No comment on that, eh? Funny. I can't wait until those studies come out....just more glory for us Mac users.
~006