mutantllama
Active Member
Deep Purple should be on MA just because they pretty much fucking wrote the first speed/thrash song.
Sure, the people who run that place are fucking elitists when it comes to metal, but still, when i want info on a new band, I dont go to Wikipedia, i got to Encyclopaedia Metallum.
And yeah, I think Poison deserves a place on MA. They sure aint heavy, but glam metal is metal too, even if I/them hate it. MA should be objective, not subjective when it comes to the content on the page.
Is any of this really a big deal? Is MA beginning to affect what we individually consider to be "metal?" It's a reference site. It's not a supreme authority on what constitutes a metal band.
Does it need to please anyone? Its a fucking encyclopedia. If its a metal encyclopedia, it better only have metal. Pointless gripe if you ask me.
What in the goddamn motherfuck is Neofolk?
Not if the authority being appealed to is reliable, which is precisely what's at issue here. Pretty hilarious joke though, bro.
It's what you got when the industrial movement started playing folk inspired music.What in the goddamn motherfuck is Neofolk?
What in the goddamn motherfuck is Neofolk?
In a nutshell, it's an excuse for (un)ambiguously gay men and art punk fag hags to strum campfire songs, randomly interrupted by bursts of hilarious, neo-Nazified, tenth-rate Skinny Puppy rip-off.
Alternately, you could just call it a big festering puddle of AIDS.
Even when the authority is "reliable," appealing to it is still fallacious. Logically speaking, only an appeal to evidence can be considered valid. Anything else amounts to a fallacy of one sort or another.