Oslo bombing

It seems that he, being an anti-Muslim, wanted to make the bombing look like it was done by Islamic fundamentalists and some say that it was only because of the after-bombing mess that he had the chance to kill so many...
I'm writing it because I'm convinced that there's nothing wrong with connecting the bombing with Islamic terrorists, it's the format they use. If someone killed a man with bear claws, would you be ashamed to presume it was done by a bear?
By the way, I have respect for religious people of any race and descent, but at the same time I hate overly politically correct thinking.

If that's what you think, then you're a fucking sheep.
 
I downloaded it earlier (found it on 4chan). Going to give it a spin now to see what it's all about.

Holy. Shit.

This guy REALLY planned this out, I mean REALLY, REALLY planned it out.

If we're up against these people the police can't do shit other than a complete lockdown.
 
Explain then.....

One cannot generalize, point fingers and resort to violent ideas and even hate speech against others who have done nothing to you, whilst at the very same time, expect -or even demand- of them not to do it to you. That's retarded and contradictory.

If you excuse that behavior because their views/politics/ethnicity etc might be different than yours -or because some amongst them happen to be scum-, how does that make you different from this guy, or any terrorist from any country? (aside from the fact that they actually take their fears and bigotries much further).

The fact that the actual terrorist turned out to be a blue eye, blond Norwegian with anti-Muslim views just makes it all the more ironic.
 
Quite a lot about his use of steroids (DBOL, Winsol) and using Modern Warfare 2 as a training simulation.

Few potential scapegoats right there.
 
If I read about a stabbing in South London, I don't automatically assume the assailant was a black man.

If I read about a sheep being fucked up the arse, I don't automatically assume it was a Welshman who did it.

If I read about a fat person, I don't automatically assume the person is American.

Assumptions are fucking bent. To assume it was a Muslim is to put yourself up for fucktard of the year award.
 
Holy. Shit.

This guy REALLY planned this out, I mean REALLY, REALLY planned it out.

If we're up against these people the police can't do shit other than a complete lockdown.

Yeah. The discipline and dedication he presents with the plan was genuinely the most disturbing thing I've ever read. Physical transformation phase? Lokis Armour System? The whole farming company cover-up? Holy fucking shit.
 
Öwen;9923181 said:
Quite a lot about his use of steroids (DBOL, Winsol)

Dianabol i don't have personal experience with, but Winstrol is DEFINITELY not a drug that would affect your thinking and influence your mood to the point of creating a so called 'Roid Rage...

[sarcasm mode on]

The media should also mention that he was straight and liked Coca Cola...

Because these two facts have about the same relevance as steroids and violent games in this matter...

Btw MW2 is one of the worst "training" games for this kind of attack... he should have used ARMA2 !

[sarcasm mode off]
 
One cannot generalize, point fingers and resort to violent ideas and even hate speech against others who have done nothing to you, whilst at the very same time, expect -or even demand- of them not to do it to you. That's retarded and contradictory.

I think you should go and read my original post, you have not understood what I was saying.

In regards to assuming who was responsible...

2000-present

2000 1 June: Real IRA bomb explodes on Hammersmith Bridge, London
2000 20 September: Real IRA fired a RPG at the MI6 HQ in London SIS Building
2001 4 March: The Real IRA detonate a car bomb outside the BBC's main news centre in London. One London Underground worker suffered deep cuts to his eye from flying glass and some damage was caused to the front of the building.[15] (See 4 March 2001 BBC bombing)
2001 16 April: Hendon post office bombed by the Real IRA.
2001 6 May: The Real IRA detonate a bomb in a London postal sorting office. One person was injured.[16]
2001 3 August: A Real IRA Bomb in Britain explodes in Ealing, West London, injuring seven people.[17] (See 3 August 2001 Ealing bombing)
2001 4 November: Real IRA car bomb explodes in Birmingham[18]
2005 7 July: The 7 July 2005 London bombings conducted by four separate Islamist extremist suicide bombers, killing 56 people and injuring 700.
2007 January - February: The 2007 United Kingdom letter bombs
2007 30 June: 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack perpetrated by Islamist extremists.
2008 22 May: 22 May 2008 Exeter bombing by an Islamist extremist, injuring only the perpetrator.

If another terrorist incident occurs in this country I will assume that it is probably related to either Islamists or the IRA.
To think "who could it have been, there is no history of this to make any temporary judgements on" is just ridiculous to be honest.
I'm not saying that you should dwell on it anymore than that at the time, I wouldn't start spouting a load of shit until the culprits are confirmed and the situation is understood fully.
Like I said in my original post the comments made in this thread earlier when people thought that it was a Jihadist or w/e were juvenile and completely premature.
 
I think you should go and read my original post, you have not understood what I was saying.

Like I said in my original post the comments made in this thread earlier when people thought that it was a Jihadist or w/e were juvenile and completely premature.

I did, but as usual I wasn't referring to 'you' specifically; rather 'you fellas' as in the pplz having jumped to premature accusations, as you well put it.
 
"... but: NRK is reporting that an unknown group called "Helpers of the Global Jihad" have posted a message that this is only the beginning of the reaction to Norwegian periodicals publishing the Muhammed cartoons, according to Andrew Boyle, a journalist in Norway."

ah ok!

Still its frightening how often people go on and blame out of assumptions, as drew pointed out
 
If I read about a stabbing in South London, I don't automatically assume the assailant was a black man.

If I read about a sheep being fucked up the arse, I don't automatically assume it was a Welshman who did it.

If I read about a fat person, I don't automatically assume the person is American.

Assumptions are fucking bent. To assume it was a Muslim is to put yourself up for fucktard of the year award.

So assuming it could have been al Qaeda makes someone dumb? After all the bombings they've done someone its dumb for assuming it could be al Qaeda? I actually grew up 45 minutes away from the shootings and I'm not going to lie, I thought it was al Qaeda from the get go. Even after I found out it was a Norwegian guy I STILL thought he was with al Qaeda. I just don't see why thinking that assuming it could be al Qaeda after an al Qaeda type attack puts me in the fucktard of the year category.

I know stereotyping and shit pisses everyone off but seriously. I'm blonde hair blue eyes, if that was a sign of a terrorist and someone were to stop me at the air port and tell me "excuse me, you fit the profile of a terrorist, we have to search you to make sure everyone is safe" I would simply say "You're right, I do fit the profile of a terrorist, so go ahead and search me and everyone else who looks like me to make sure that everyone get's home alive." I really feel like people are too sensitive in this world and everyone has to appologize for silly shit.

By the way, what you said about the Welsh is fucking hilarious. An anti-stereotyping rant turned into a stereotype fest. Fucking golden
 
All Christian leaders will denounce this attack as being not in accordance with Christian values or ethos. Any persons claiming to be Christian leaders who support this attack (ie: westboro baptist church) either will be or have been denounced like wise.

I don't see why this would happen. It's not a religious attack that's been carried out. Clearly it was politically motivated. So why would christian churches want to denounce the attack???
 
Dianabol i don't have personal experience with, but Winstrol is DEFINITELY not a drug that would affect your thinking and influence your mood to the point of creating a so called 'Roid Rage...

[sarcasm mode on]

The media should also mention that he was straight and liked Coca Cola...

Because these two facts have about the same relevance as steroids and violent games in this matter...

Btw MW2 is one of the worst "training" games for this kind of attack... he should have used ARMA2 !

[sarcasm mode off]

*Winstrol rather

Yeah I never wanted to imply that it would, rather that it may end up being used as some sort of media blame game later on. As thats still yet to happen there is hope for common sense.
 
So assuming it could have been al Qaeda makes someone dumb? After all the bombings they've done someone its dumb for assuming it could be al Qaeda? I actually grew up 45 minutes away from the shootings and I'm not going to lie, I thought it was al Qaeda from the get go. Even after I found out it was a Norwegian guy I STILL thought he was with al Qaeda. I just don't see why thinking that assuming it could be al Qaeda after an al Qaeda type attack puts me in the fucktard of the year category.

I know stereotyping and shit pisses everyone off but seriously. I'm blonde hair blue eyes, if that was a sign of a terrorist and someone were to stop me at the air port and tell me "excuse me, you fit the profile of a terrorist, we have to search you to make sure everyone is safe" I would simply say "You're right, I do fit the profile of a terrorist, so go ahead and search me and everyone else who looks like me to make sure that everyone get's home alive." I really feel like people are too sensitive in this world and everyone has to appologize for silly shit.

By the way, what you said about the Welsh is fucking hilarious. An anti-stereotyping rant turned into a stereotype fest. Fucking golden

Mate, thinking it was related to al Qaeda is NOT the same thing as thinking it was related to Muslims.
 
So assuming it could have been al Qaeda makes someone dumb? After all the bombings they've done someone its dumb for assuming it could be al Qaeda? I actually grew up 45 minutes away from the shootings and I'm not going to lie, I thought it was al Qaeda from the get go. Even after I found out it was a Norwegian guy I STILL thought he was with al Qaeda. I just don't see why thinking that assuming it could be al Qaeda after an al Qaeda type attack puts me in the fucktard of the year category.

I know stereotyping and shit pisses everyone off but seriously. I'm blonde hair blue eyes, if that was a sign of a terrorist and someone were to stop me at the air port and tell me "excuse me, you fit the profile of a terrorist, we have to search you to make sure everyone is safe" I would simply say "You're right, I do fit the profile of a terrorist, so go ahead and search me and everyone else who looks like me to make sure that everyone get's home alive." I really feel like people are too sensitive in this world and everyone has to appologize for silly shit.

By the way, what you said about the Welsh is fucking hilarious. An anti-stereotyping rant turned into a stereotype fest. Fucking golden

thinking it could have been...not dumb. Assuming it was, in the face of evidence to the contrary.....very dumb.

Being treated as a second class citizen and being discriminated against because of the actions of an incredibly small minority who just happen to have the same colour skin as you is totally and utterly wrong (and really not clever in the long run).
I find it deeply saddening that there are a significant number of people who are so short sighted and lacking in empathy that they think it's ok.