NineFeetUnderground said:
right. lets go down the list shall we?
A. both are extreme metal bands and/or were rooted in such as their foundation.
B. both have obvious affinities for progressive rock and psychedelia & incorporate it
C. both have long songs with unconventional structures
D. both toggle between harsh vocals and atmospheres to calm and mellow
E. both continue to progress and improve their abilities on every album
F. both continue to write ONLY what pleases them regardless of trends
G. both bands have similar trajectories and approaches regardless what you say.
A. Opeth was borderline Gothemburg when they started. Hardly what I would term "extreme metal" as opposed to Iron Maiden being played fast with harsh vocals. Mike stated himself in countless interviews that the rise of Gothemburg steered the early style into what it is now.
Enslaved on the other hand was rooted in Black Metal, but psychologically and topically on Viking lore. Definitely extreme and also given the black metal psychology influence on their work. Death metal extremism holds little in comparison imo and does not celebrate ethnic lore (a form of extreme expression itself).
Your point is null.
B. Opeth have no affinity of psychedelia in their music (the closest they came was the second half of "Closure") Progressive? Yes and plenty of it, few do it better. For progressive metal music, Opeth are way ahead.
Enslaved have been on the psychedelia trip since Vikingligr Veldi (inspect usage of repetition & mixing on this album). For psychedelic Metal, Enslaved are ahead.
Both bands have a progressive influence, but from totally different strains of the progressive rock world, and also executed very differently. If you cant hear this, you cant hear the difference between Madonna and Bruce Dickinson.
Now, listen to some Hawkwind and Hendrix, and tell me you hear this influence plastered all over Opeth's music. Now go and listen to Blodhemn and Mardraum, Isa and Ruun, and do the same. The evidence is as audible as a police siren.
psy·che·del·ic ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sk-dlk)
adj.
Of, characterized by, or generating hallucinations, distortions of perception, altered states of awareness, and occasionally states resembling psychosis.
C. And they both have long hair. Whats your point? Perhaps we should add Motorhead into this because Lemmy has a moustache and Akerfeldt does too? Your example is too generic. Be more specific.
D. So do Emperor, Borknagar, Vintersorg, Peccatum, Bathory, Deathspell Omega (lesser extent, see Kenose), Agalloch and Ulver among others. Maybe we should include them into this topic too? Again, your example is too generic. Be more specific.
E. So will any band with a brain. Totally void point. In a landscape of bands where they form to create image as opposed to musical honesty & longevity, this is only a logical path that the real bands would do anything but their own thing (eg, Iron Maiden, Motorhead, Negura Bunget, Bathory, Agalloch). Eventually they shed most influences and continue to expand on "their vision".
F. Again, irrelevant. Any band with intelligence will do the same. See above. Both points are essentially the same.
G. Prove it, on what grounds? Your answer only proves that you know little of the Enslaved trajectory and approach. Your answer is in short, a cheating tactic to hide that you have nothing to say on this point. I want proof.
Your conceptions of music, while often well presented, can sometimes be horribly off-centre. Your problem is that you have a hard time accepting this and any criticism, coupled with the fact that many other people in this world take music seriously too and have a passion and knowledge for it equal to or beyond your own.
Now bend over, or post REAL and
detailed examples and I will consider them: I'm sick of your boring repetitive posts, now prove yourself... PROPERLY.