mutantllama
Active Member
You know who needs to be president?
Ozzy Osbourne.
There, it's been said.
He wasn't born in the U.S. But.... http://www.last.fm/group/dio4president DIO CAN!
You know who needs to be president?
Ozzy Osbourne.
There, it's been said.
And the best. Balanced budget and great economic expansion, and no real fuck-ups other than fucking an intern... whoop-dee-doo, JFK fucked Marilyn Monroe.
1. There are perfectly good non-lethal alternatives to firearms such as a tazer or stun gun, which yes they can kill but it takes fucking effort and if you're defending yourself you're not going to generally put in that kind of effort.
2. To be quite honest what the fuck does someones sexual activities have to do with their capacity to lead a country? None.
3. One thing, what sane fucking person would ever stockpile arms?
Clinton was the coolest president since JFK.
I don't understand people thinking Hillary is that bad. I mean besides the penis.
1. I'm not interested in that crap
2. if he were Republican, like I said before, the "moral majority" would've had him impeached
3. who cares? I like guns, fuck you.
1. Then you're a fool stuck in your own stagnant waters with no potential for growth as a human. It is the right of each person to defend themselves, but using lethal means is not the proper answer when there are perfectly non-lethal means of doing so, ones that are just as effective. You should above all be promoting human life and not killing "criminals."
2. He was impeached you idiot, go back to high school and take your political science class seriously.
3. It is fine to like guns, but that doesn't mean anything. No sane person would stockpile fire arms.
whats wrong with killing people? thins out the population. You liberals know damn well thats a problem in the world and I realize it too.
god they're so many bleeding hearts here. Now the Red Cross is going to wonder where their blood supply went...
and since when was he impeached? they never succeeded. he got voted out of office.
whats wrong with killing people? thins out the population. You liberals know damn well thats a problem in the world and I realize it too...
and since when was he impeached? they never succeeded. he got voted out of office.
whats wrong with killing people? thins out the population. You liberals know damn well thats a problem in the world and I realize it too.
FDR had three terms in office, and after that there was a constitutional amendment passed setting a two term limit.
Since your a retard, then your first. We have to kill off the unfit.
Since your a retard, then your first. We have to kill off the unfit.
Thank you. Anyone who thinks there's nothing wrong with killing has brain damage.
But to give a more serious answer to ohiogrinder's question:
As far as the whole 'thinning out the population' argument goes, there are ways to do that without dehumanizing life and creating a situation that welcomes anarchy or worldwide despotism.
For one thing, populations do get thinned out routinely in undeveloped areas, where 3/4 of a family's children end up starving to death in infancy or childhood. And if the developed world ever started having problems with scarcity of resources, they could just pass birth control laws. It worked for China.